Complex operations, bra-ket notation, confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding bra-ket notation and complex coefficients in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of the Stern-Gerlach experiment. The text explains that while each coefficient in the state vectors has both amplitude and phase, only the relative phase between components is physically meaningful. This allows for the simplification of the state vectors by choosing one coefficient to be real and positive, leading to a clearer representation. The user seeks clarification on whether it is valid to set the absolute phase of one coefficient to zero for simplification. The conclusion emphasizes that selecting a convenient relationship can facilitate calculations in quantum mechanics.
demoncore
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Sorry for disregarding the template; I'm not really working out a homework problem as much as just trying to follow the reasoning in the text. I'm working through the first chapter of Quantum Mechanics, McIntyre, and I'm a little bit confused by the following.

The text introduces bra-ket notation in the context of the Stern-Gerlach experiment, deriving some results having to do with the spin measured along various axes and relating it to the state vector. (Please read the _ sign as a subscript)

They write the 'general form' of the S_x state kets in terms of the S-z bases kets:

|+>_x = a |+> + b |->
|->_x = c |+> + d |->,

They also have the following experimental results:

|<+|+>|^2 = |<-|+>|^2 = |<+|->|^2 = |<-|->^2 = 0.5 (all S_x state vectors)

expanding and equating they find that |a|^2 = |b|^2 = |c|^2 = |d|^2 = 0.5

This is the paragraph that confuses me--I think it might be my unfamiliarity with complex operations:
Because each coefficient is complex, each has an amplitude and phase. However, the overall phase of a quantum state vector is not physically meaningful. Only the relative phase between different components of the state vector is physically measurable. Hence, we are free to choose one coefficient of each vector to be real and positive without any loss of generality. This allows us to write the desired states as:

|+>_x = (1/√2) [ |+> + e^(iα) |->]
|->_x = (1/√2) [ |+> + e^(iβ) |->]

I am a little confused by the reasoning here. I suppose |a|^2 = (1/√2) => a = (1/√2) * e^(iθ); the absolute phase of the state vector doesn't matter, so we are free to take θ= 0 for one coefficient of each vector?

Please correct any terminology/reasoning errors I have made here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose [since] the absolute phase of the state vector doesn't matter, so we are free to take θ= 0 for one coefficient of each vector?
That's what I read.
Where you are free to pick a relationship, pick one that makes the math easy.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top