Complex Variables and Integration

AI Thread Summary
The integral from 0 to infinity of [x^m/(x^2 + 1)^2] for 1<m<3 can be solved using complex variable techniques by selecting an appropriate contour. The contour should extend from infinity along the positive real axis, loop around the origin, and return to infinity while considering the branch point at z=0. The Cauchy Integral Theorem is applied to evaluate the integral, accounting for residues from the loop around the origin and the contributions from the linear segments of the contour. Singularities at z=i and z=-i are included within the contour, requiring careful bookkeeping of contributions. This method effectively allows for the evaluation of the integral using complex analysis.
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
How do I solve the following integral using complex variable techniques

The integral from 0 to infinity of [x^m/(x^2 + 1)^2]; 1<m<3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ed Quanta said:
How do I solve the following integral using complex variable techniques

The integral from 0 to infinity of [x^m/(x^2 + 1)^2]; 1<m<3

You will have to select a contour judiciously. Since m is not generally an integer then z = 0 is a branch point. Choose the branch to extend from 0 to infinity along the postive real axis. For your contour, one part will extend from infinity along the positive real axis and loop arbitrarily close to the origin then continue along the positive real axis paying close attention to the fact that z = R e^{2 \pi i} along that portion of the contour. The rest of your contour circles around from \infty e^{0i} to \infty e^{2\pi i}.

Now just apply the Cauchy Integral Theorem! You'll pick up a residue from the small loop around the origin and the two linear segments have different phases and their sum is proportional to the integral you want to evaluate.
 
What about the singularities at z=i and at z=-i?
Do I make my contour so that these two points are not included?
 
Ed Quanta said:
What about the singularities at z=i and at z=-i?
Do I make my contour so that these two points are not included?

Using the contour I described, those singularities are included. You have to be aware of what is inside and outside the contour and it becomes a simple matter of proper bookkeeping!
 
Last edited:
So let me get this straight, we have a contour that extends from infinity along the positive real axis, loop around as it comes close to the origin, and then what does it do on the negative real axis? Sorry, just trying to get this picture in my head.
 
Okay - step by step: Start at infinity along the positive real axis and go toward the origin. Loop around the origin (tiny loop!) and go back out to infinity (on the e^{2\pi i} side!) then close your loop with a big circle at infinity. We're choosing z = R e^{2\pi i} to be the branch cut.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top