Component of the quadrupole Q_ij

  • Thread starter Thread starter ellocomateo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between the quadrupole components Q_ij and the spatial distribution of the electric quadrupole field. The user seeks clarification on how to visualize Q_ij as an ellipsoid and its connection to the equipotential lines depicted in a referenced lecture slide. They inquire specifically about when the gradient \nabla_k Q_ij equals zero for indices i and j not equal to k. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the labeling of axes in the plot of the electric quadrupole field, which exhibits four-fold symmetry. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer explanations of these concepts in the context of electrostatic multipoles.
ellocomateo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I do not manage to visualize the link between the component of the quadrupole Q_ij and the spatial distribution of the electric quadrupole field.

I was told to imagine the Q_ij as an ellipsoid, which I understand (the ellipsoid "radius" in a given direction being the strength of the quadrupole along this direction). Yet what is the link between the Q_ij and the usual representation in Slide 12 of this file?:
cems.uvm.edu/~oughstun/LectureNotes141/Topic_09%20%28ElectrostaticMultipoles%29.pdf

In particular, I want to find out when does the gradient \nabla_k Q_ij equal zero? When i,j =! k ?

Pleeeease, help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The azimuthal gradient of V(r,θ,\varphi) in slide 11 is proportional to \frac{d}{d\theta}\left(3\cos^2\theta-1 \right)=6\sin\theta\cos\theta=3\sin\left(2\theta \right)
 


Thank you for commenting, but how does this translate to the i and j ?
 


ellocomateo said:
Thank you for commenting, but how does this translate to the i and j ?
Perhaps you and I are looking at different slides and/or files. I am looking at slide 12 of the file
www.cems.uvm.edu/~oughstun/LectureNotes141/Topic_09%20%28ElectrostaticMultipoles%29.pdf
which is a plot of the equipotential lines of V(r,θ,φ) of a linear electric quadrupole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


We are looking on the same graph, but I still do not see how I should label the axes.
There is no information whatsoever on this point. Or at least I do not see it.
 


The plot is a combination of the gradient and the equipotential lines of V(r,θ,φ) using r and z as axes. The four-fold symmetry indicates it is a quadrupole field.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top