Composite functions and domains

bacon
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The forward-back function is
f (t) = 2t for 0\leq{t}\leq{3} ,
f(t)= 12-2t for 3\leq{t}\leq{6}. Graph f(f(t)) and find
its four-part formula. First try t = 1.5 and 3.

The Attempt at a Solution


There are four possible composite functions from the two given functions:

2(2(t))=4t

12-2(2(t))=-4t+12

2(12-2t)=-4t+24

12-2(12-2t)=4t-12

Since the domain of f (t) = 2t is from 0 to 3 and the domain of f(t)= 12-2t is from 3 to 6 it seems to me that only the first and fourth functions are valid. Functions two and three have a part of the composite function applied outside its defined domain. Instead of a four part formula I get a two part one:

2(2(t)) for 0\leq{t}\leq{3}

12-2(12-2t) for 3\leq{t}\leq{6}

The answer in the back of the book gives:

2(2t) for 0\leq{t}\leq{1.5}

12-4t for 1.5\leq{t}\leq{3}

12-2(12-2t) for 3\leq{t}\leq{4.5}

2(12-2t) for 4.5\leq{t}\leq{6}

I also don't see the relevance of "First try t = 1.5 and 3".
Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relevance is just so that you see whether inside its domain it's a continuous function. though maybe with sharp corners (if the slope of the function is not an everywhere continuous function). You have a formula f(t) = one thing for a stretch up to t=3 but another thing for t\leq{3}. Can you see intuitively that if the two formulae give the same result for t=3 the function is continuous, and if not there is a discontinuity?

And what is the relevance of that? Well in dealing with a function you'll almost always want to know what it looks like - you would be naturally led a the start to look at f(x) at the break point t=3. As for 1.5 - well you'll see when you have calculated f(f(t)).
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top