Composition of functions domains

bcheero
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is it always true that the domain of f(g(x)) is the intersection of the domains of f(x) and g(x)?

I've been having trouble with this and this answer would make me fully understand this concept.

Thanks to everyone!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It depends on the range of g. If the range of g is contained within the domain of f, then the domain of g is the domain of f(g(x)). If the range of g is not contained, then the part of the range outside is cutoff, inducing a cutoff in the useful domain of of g, i.e. that which ends up as the domain of f(g(x))
 
bcheero said:
Is it always true that the domain of f(g(x)) is the intersection of the domains of f(x) and g(x)?

I've been having trouble with this and this answer would make me fully understand this concept.

Thanks to everyone!
No, it is not always true. In fact it is seldom true. What is true is that the domain of f(g(x)) is that subset of the domain of g such that g(x) is in the domain of f(x).
 
bcheero said:
Is it always true that the domain of f(g(x)) is the intersection of the domains of f(x) and g(x)?

The domain is simply the set of values your function can accept as input.

The function f o g has the same domain as g which we can pretty safely assume to be all the real numbers.

The domain of f might be more narrow, but f o g has the same domain as g.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top