Composition of planets vs. moons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the composition of planets versus moons in the Solar System, noting a 1:1 ratio of gas planets to terrestrial planets. In contrast, the ratio of gas moons, defined as moons orbiting gas giants, to terrestrial moons is significantly higher at approximately 165:3. Participants express skepticism about the existence of "gas moons," clarifying that all known moons are rocky, with some having thin oceans. The conversation concludes with the observation that there appears to be no correlation between the ratios of planets and their respective moons. Overall, the topic highlights the distinct differences in composition between planetary and moon types.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
In our Solar System, how does the ratio of gas planets to terrestrial planets compare with that of gas moons to terrestrial moons?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi Loren Booda! :smile:

Surely there are no "gas moons"? :confused:
 
Well gas planets to terrestrial planets is obviously 1:1 and gas moons (i.e moons around gas planets, tim) to terrestrial moons is like 165:3.

There appears to be no correlation at all. Oh well.
 
Kracatoan said:
Well gas planets to terrestrial planets is obviously 1:1 and gas moons (i.e moons around gas planets, tim) to terrestrial moons is like 165:3.

There appears to be no correlation at all. Oh well.

Sorry. Are there no liquid moons? That is basically what I meant by "gas moons."
 
I believe all solar system moons are believed to be rocky.

That includes a few that have thin oceans above the rocky surface.
 
God bless us, every one!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top