I Composition of Two Continuous Functions .... Browder, Proposition 3.12

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary
I need help with an aspect of Andrew Browder's proof that the composition of two continuous functions is continuous ...
I am reading Andrew Browder's book: "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction" ... ...

I am currently reading Chapter 3: Continuous Functions on Intervals and am currently focused on Section 3.1 Limits and Continuity ... ...

I need some help in understanding the proof of Proposition 3.12 ...Proposition 3.12 and its proof read as follows:
Browder - Proposition 3.12 ... .png
In the above proof by Browder we read the following:

" ... ... Since ##f(I) \subset J##, ##f^{ -1 } ( g^{ -1 }(V) ) = f^{ -1 } (U) \cap f^{ -1 } (J) = f^{ -1 } (U)## ... ... "My question is as follows:

Can someone please explain exactly why/how ##f^{ -1 } (U) \cap f^{ -1 } (J) = f^{ -1 } (U)## ... ...
Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have an equation of the type ##A \cap B = A##. If you draw a Venn diagram, you will see that this is equivalent to ##A \subseteq B##. Now ##I \subseteq f^{-1}(J)## but ##I## is all we have, so ##I=f^{-1}(J)##.

More interesting is why ##f^{-1}(U\cap J) =f^{-1}(U) \cap f^{-1}(J)##. Can you tell why this is true?
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
fresh_42 said:
You have an equation of the type ##A \cap B = A##. If you draw a Venn diagram, you will see that this is equivalent to ##A \subseteq B##. Now ##I \subseteq f^{-1}(J)## but ##I## is all we have, so ##I=f^{-1}(J)##.

More interesting is why ##f^{-1}(U\cap J) =f^{-1}(U) \cap f^{-1}(J)##. Can you tell why this is true?
Thanks fresh_42 ... can now see why ##f^{ -1 } (U) \cap f^{ -1 } (J) = f^{ -1 } (U)## ... ...

As for ##f^{-1}(U\cap J) =f^{-1}(U) \cap f^{-1}(J)## ... I know this is true for any sets U and J (See Topology by Munkres, Exercise 2(c) page 20 ...) ... but I think you are asking me to give a sense of why it is true ... but I have not yet got any ideas regarding this ...

Thanks again for your help ...

Peter
 
Such equations are often shown elementwise: choose an arbitrary element $x\in f^{-1}(A\cap B)$ and show that it is in ##f^{-1}(A)## and in ##f^{-1}(B)##, too. For the other direction, choose an element ##x\in f^{-1}(A)\cap f^{-1}(B)## and show that it is an element of ## f^{-1}(A\cap B)##. As long as it is true for an arbitrary element, as long is it true for all elements.
 
fresh_42 said:
Such equations are often shown elementwise: choose an arbitrary element $x\in f^{-1}(A\cap B)$ and show that it is in ##f^{-1}(A)## and in ##f^{-1}(B)##, too. For the other direction, choose an element ##x\in f^{-1}(A)\cap f^{-1}(B)## and show that it is an element of ## f^{-1}(A\cap B)##. As long as it is true for an arbitrary element, as long is it true for all elements.
Oh ... so you were asking for a formal proof ...

That, I think would proceed as follows:

To prove ... ##f^{-1} (A \cap B) =f^{-1} (A) \cap f^{-1} (B)##

Now ... ##x \in f^{-1}(A \cap B)##

##\Longrightarrow f(x) \in A \cap B##

##\Longrightarrow f(x) \in A## and ##f(x) \in B##

##\Longrightarrow x \in f^{-1} (A)## and ##x \in f^{-1} (B)##

##\Longrightarrow x \in f^{-1} (A) \cap f^{-1} (B)##

So ... we have ##f^{-1} (A \cap B) \subset f^{-1} (A) \cap f^{-1} (B)## ... ... ... ... ... (1)Now ... ##x \in f^{-1} (A) \cap f^{-1} (B)##

##\Longrightarrow x \in f^{-1} (A)## and ##x \in f^{-1} (B)##

##\Longrightarrow f(x) \in A## and ##f(x) \in B##

##\Longrightarrow f(x) \in A \cap B##

##\Longrightarrow x \in f^{-1}(A \cap B)##

So ... we have ##f^{-1} (A) \cap f^{-1} (B) \subset f^{-1} (A \cap B)## ... ... ... ... ... (2)

Now ... (1) and (2) imply ##f^{-1} (A \cap B) =f^{-1} (A) \cap f^{-1} (B)##

Is that correct?Thanks again for your help ...

Peter
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
Math Amateur said:
Is that correct?
Yep, correct. It does not generally work for ##f##, where we have ##f(A\cap B) \subseteq f(A) \cap f(B)## but not the other direction.
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top