raw
- 35
- 0
Compositions of functions and integrability (is this right?)
The characteristic function of Q is defined as g(x)=1 when x is rational and 0 when it isn't.
The rational ruler function is defined as follows= If x=p/q is rational then f(x)=1/q and 0 when z isn't rational.
g(f(x))=1 when x is rational and 0 when it isn't so the composition is equal to the characteristic function for Q and we know that isn't integrable. I just want to know if this is right. It just seems too easy...
Homework Statement
We know that if f is integrable and g is continuous then g\circf is integrable. Show to this is not necessarily true for piecewise continuity. We are given the hint to use a ruler function and characteristic function.Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
I decided to use the characteristic function of Q for g as it was the one example the book gave of a characteristic function that is not integrable and the rational ruler function for f.The characteristic function of Q is defined as g(x)=1 when x is rational and 0 when it isn't.
The rational ruler function is defined as follows= If x=p/q is rational then f(x)=1/q and 0 when z isn't rational.
g(f(x))=1 when x is rational and 0 when it isn't so the composition is equal to the characteristic function for Q and we know that isn't integrable. I just want to know if this is right. It just seems too easy...
Last edited: