Compounding Interest Formulas for Varying Annual Deposits and Interest Rates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
Eph
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I think I found a simple formula if I was putting in the same amount of money each year, but what if I wanted to start with 1000$, add 10k$ for 10 years, and then watch it compound at X interest; how would i set that up?

And if you know, can you put this formula into Excell.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Eph said:
I think I found a simple formula if I was putting in the same amount of money each year, but what if I wanted to start with 1000$, add 10k$ for 10 years, and then watch it compound at X interest; how would i set that up?

It's very easy to do with Excel -- just have the first cell with the starting amount, then for each cell below it have the interest formula beneath, referring to the cell above as principle, and add in the amount you deposit each year.
 
What about if you want to just put in a deposit of say 10k per annum for 10 years but have it still compound at the same yearly rate?
 
Eph said:
What about if you want to just put in a deposit of say 10k per annum for 10 years but have it still compound at the same yearly rate?

Yep, just like I said. Follow the instructions above.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top