What is the compressibility module and why is it important in fluid mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The compressibility module, also known as the Bulk Modulus, measures how much a fluid's volume changes in response to pressure changes, defined mathematically as B = -(F/A)/(ΔV/V). The negative sign indicates that an increase in pressure results in a decrease in volume, highlighting the relationship between pressure and compressibility. In fluids, the inverse of the compressibility module is often used, indicating how incompressible a fluid is; for example, water has a high Bulk Modulus, making it nearly incompressible. The discussion also touches on the need for mathematical tools, such as derivatives, to better understand these concepts. Overall, the Bulk Modulus is crucial for understanding fluid behavior under varying pressure conditions.
TeTeC
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone !

I'm currently working on a problem in Eugene Hecht's Physics book. It's about static fluid and the "compressibility module". I'm not sure this traduction makes sense, because my book is translated into French and I can't find the correct English expression. For those who have this book within easy reach, just read the exercice number 20 at chapter 11. For others, I'll give you an approximate translation, as good as my English can be...

Hecht's book said:
The compressibility module is defined as B = -(F/A)/(DeltaV/V) where the variation in volume of the body is a result of the application of a uniform F force distributed on the whole surface A. Give for B a more accurate expression taking into account the variation in hydrostatic pressure working on the object. In fluids, we often use the inverse of B, which is the compressibility, K. Explain what is its meaning. Why the sign (-) ?

Ok, I know I have to give what I've already discovered, but unfortunately all I found is nothing, except the fact that F/A = P. This exercice should normally use (as it is classified in the exercices using mathematical tools) something like a derivative, but I can't find the purpose of any derivative. Clearly, I need some help, a start... ;)

Thank a lot !

TeTeC

(Excuse me for the potentially bad English mistakes, French is my mother tongue)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're alos referring to what is called the Bulk Modulus, or Bulk Modulus of Elasticity E_v. The way I am used to seeing it is in the form of:

E_v = - \frac{\delta p}{\delta V / V} This can also be shown in the form of E_v = - \frac{\delta p}{\delta \rho / \rho}

It simply is a measure of the change in volume of a fluid due to a change in pressure. The negative sign indicates that the volume decreases with an increase in pressure differential. The larger the value, the closer to incompressible a fluid is.
 
Ok, the Bulk Modulus explains the "B". :smile:

Now that I have the answer, the transformation to apply is easier to find... V = m/rho, and then comes your expression.

I've just been reading that the Bulk Modulus of Elasticity is something like 2.2 x 10^9 N/m². That gives a great reason to say that water is nearly incompressible.

Off Topic : don't you know which software I could download to translate things like MathType objects into Latex ?

Thanks ! :wink:

TeTeC
 
A good number for how compressible water is is that a about a 1% change in volume happens with 3125 psi. The incompressible assumption on most liquids is a valid one. Gasses on the other hand...no go.

In regards to the software question, I really have no idea on what you can use. Sorry.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top