Compression of spring wrt speed

AI Thread Summary
A block sliding on a frictionless surface compresses a spring by 2.34 cm at speed v. The problem involves determining the new compression when the block travels at 4.00v. Participants discuss equating kinetic and potential energy to find the relationship between speeds and compressions. The correct approach involves using the ratio of the squares of the speeds to the squares of the compressions. Clarification is provided on how to set up the equations properly to solve for the new compression.
brunettegurl
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block sliding along a horizontal frictionless surface with speed v collides with a spring and compresses it by 2.34 cm. What will be the compression if the same block collides with the spring at a speed of 4.00v?

Homework Equations



e=0.5mvSUP]2[/SUP] e= 0.5k*x2

The Attempt at a Solution


i thought abt equating the two and solving it in regards but there are too many unknown values to cancel them out...and also to find a way to make a connection btw the given information.
my next thought was to times the given compression by 4 since the speed is also increased but that proved to be wrong..pls. help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brunettegurl said:
my next thought was to times the given compression by 4 since the speed is also increased but that proved to be wrong
That should be correct. [edit: At first I said it was wrong, but I didn't read it carefully.]

Set up a ratio to verify it.
 
Last edited:
Equate both energies, potential and kinetic for both systems independently. Then divide the equations against each other and see what pops out.
 
ok ...so I'm a little confused abt the divide them against part..so if i do that the k and m would cancel off living (v2+16v2)= (0.0234)2(x2)...does that look right or am i totally off track??
 
brunettegurl said:
ok ...so I'm a little confused abt the divide them against part..so if i do that the k and m would cancel off living (v2+16v2)= (0.0234)2(x2)...does that look right or am i totally off track??
I don't quite understand what you did. Yes, the m and k drop out, but you should have v12/v22 = x12/x22 (or equivalent).

(Read my correction to my last post.)
 
ok thanks :))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top