Computation about Gaussian and Dirac Delta Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on computing the product of a Gaussian distribution and a Dirac Delta function, specifically N(t; μ, σ) * δ(t > 0). Participants express confusion over the notation δ(t > 0) and the proper context for using Dirac delta functions, which are distributions rather than conventional functions. A reference to Microsoft's Adpredictor model is made, where a similar expression is used, leading to questions about its validity and interpretation. Some contributors suggest that there may be errors in the equations presented in the referenced paper. Overall, clarity on the mathematical treatment of these functions and their applications in the context of the Adpredictor model is sought.
keliu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a Gaussian distribution about t, say, N(t; μ, σ), and a a Dirac Delta Function δ(t).

Then how can I compute: N(t; μ, σ) * δ(t > 0)

Any clues? Or recommender some materials for me to read?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've never seen the notation δ(t > 0) for a Dirac delta function, what do you mean by this? Also, Dirac delta functions are not really functions (they are "distributions") and should not really appear outside of an integral, so I'm not sure what you're trying to compute...maybe you could specify what your motivations are for looking at this quantity?
 
In fact I am reading a paper about Microsoft's Adpredictor model. And here is a web article about the model's derivative process.

In the Step 7 of the web article, the author says that :
p(t) = N(t; μ, σ2)δ(y = sign(t)) and when y = 1, p(t) = N(t; μ, σ2)δ(t > 0) and then t has a truncated normal distribution. I don't understand how he could do that how he finish the full step 7.

Because the blog does not have any contact information about the owner, so I came here.

Thanks!
 
I...I can't make heads or tails of that at all, sorry. Hopefully someone better versed in this than me can help you.
 
As far as I can tell from the paper, it seems like either they goofed or the rendering in the pdf file had a problem. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that the two "delta" equations on the fourth page should read:
<br /> p(s|\mathbf{x,w}) = \delta(s - \mathbf{w^T x}).<br />
and
<br /> p(y|t)= \delta(y - sign(t)).<br />
These interpretations seem consistent with the words that precede each equation. jason
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top