A Computation time for adiabatic evolution

mupsi
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Hi,

my problem: following the adiabatic theorem we get an equation for the coefficients:

<br /> \dot{a}_{m}=-a_{m} \langle{\psi_{m}} | \dot{\psi}_{m}\rangle - \sum_{n \neq m} \frac{\langle \psi_{m} | \dot{H}| \psi_{m}\rangle}{E_{n}-E_{m}} exp(\int_ 0^t E_{n}(t&#039;)-E_{m}(t&#039;) \, dt&#039;)<br />

we start in an eigenstate m. When the gap is large and the time derivative of H is small. We can neglect the sum and get for the coefficent m:

<br /> a_m^0= a_m(0) exp(-i \gamma_m (t))<br />

so far so good. Now we want to determine the 1st order coefficients and make the ansatz:

<br /> a_m= a_m^0 + a_m^1<br />

and we get:

<br /> a_m^1= \sum_{n \neq m} \frac{\langle \psi_{m} | \dot{H}| \psi_{m}\rangle}{(E_{n}-E_{m})^2} a_n^0 exp(\int_ 0^t E_{n}(t&#039;)-E_{m}(t&#039;) \, dt&#039;)<br />

the last step is problematic. It's been a while since I used perturbation theory and I don't know how you get this result. The computation time should be:

<br /> t&lt;&lt;\frac{\langle \psi_{m} | \dot{H}| \psi_{m}\rangle}{(E_{n}-E_{m})^2}<br />

which is clear once you obtain the result above. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mupsi said:
Hi,

my problem: following the adiabatic theorem we get an equation for the coefficients:

<br /> \dot{a}_{m}=-a_{m} \langle{\psi_{m}} | \dot{\psi}_{m}\rangle - \sum_{n \neq m} \frac{\langle \psi_{m} | \dot{H}| \psi_{m}\rangle}{E_{n}-E_{m}} exp(\int_ 0^t E_{n}(t&#039;)-E_{m}(t&#039;) \, dt&#039;)<br />

we start in an eigenstate m. When the gap is large and the time derivative of H is small. We can neglect the sum and get for the coefficent m:

<br /> a_m^0= a_m(0) exp(-i \gamma_m (t))<br />

so far so good. Now we want to determine the 1st order coefficients and make the ansatz:

<br /> a_m= a_m^0 + a_m^1<br />

and we get:

<br /> a_m^1= \sum_{n \neq m} \frac{\langle \psi_{m} | \dot{H}| \psi_{m}\rangle}{(E_{n}-E_{m})^2} a_n^0 exp(\int_ 0^t E_{n}(t&#039;)-E_{m}(t&#039;) \, dt&#039;)<br />

the last step is problematic. It's been a while since I used perturbation theory and I don't know how you get this result. The computation time should be:

<br /> t&lt;&lt;\frac{\langle \psi_{m} | \dot{H}| \psi_{m}\rangle}{(E_{n}-E_{m})^2}<br />

which is clear once you obtain the result above. Can anyone help?
not sure how to edit posts... a few remarks: it should be t>>... and gamma is the geometric phase.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top