Compute damping as a function of frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing damping as a function of frequency using a transfer function derived from input force and output acceleration. The user employs the "-3dB method" to determine damping for the first mode but encounters discrepancies between this method and their calculations, yielding incoherent damping values. They express confusion over the relationship between stiffness, Young's modulus, and the loss factor, seeking confirmation of the equation K = E(1+i*η). The user is looking for clarification on their calculations and alternative methods to compute damping across frequencies. Overall, the thread highlights challenges in accurately determining damping in structural analysis.
Delmache
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm french, so sorry for my bad english.

I have a problem to compute the damping as a function of frequency. In fact, I plot the transfer function between the input (which is a force applied bu a hammer) and the output (which is an acceleration). Therefore, I can analyse the mode of the structure... I want to know the damping of the first mode, so I have used the "-3dB method". But I need to justify the value from the "-3dB method". What I'd like to do, is to compute the damping over the frequency (between 0-200 Hz). As I said before, my transfer function is the following :

H* = Output/Input = a/F

As you know, the stiffness is computed by :

K = F/delta(d)


What I do is that I use the transfer function to compute the damping, so I transform the equation of the transfer function as following :

1/H* = F/a


F/(a/jw)² = F/d (as you know d=a/(jw)²

So, 1/H* = -(w²*F)/a

Therefore, K* = -w²/H*

Then, I compute "eta" which is the damping by the following equation :

eta = Imaginary(K)/Real(K)

But when I do these calculations, I find very strange results. Balow, I show you an example of what I find :

mini_387170damping.jpg


First, I don't find the same value of damping obtained from the "-3dB method".
Second, I find incoherent values of damping (>1 or <1...). I can't explain this curve and why my computation doesn't work. What do I do wrong ?
Or, is there an other method to compute the damping as a function of frequency ?

Thank you very much for your help.B.D
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi

Anyone can help me ?

Thanks
B.D
 
Hi,

I am looking for the relation between the stiffness, the young's modulus and the loss factor. I think that's K = E(1+i*η), but I'm not sure of that. Can someone confirm that equation ? Because I need to justify the following equation : η = imaginary(K) / real(K).
Thanks a lot,
B.D
 
Last edited:
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top