Computing distance and time from a differential equation

AI Thread Summary
To compute the distance traveled and the time needed for a change in speed from v1 to v2 using the differential equation k1*v' = k2 - k3*v^2, one must first derive the velocity function v(t). This involves solving the equation through separation of variables and integrating using partial fractions. However, challenges may arise if the integral does not converge based on the given constants. It is essential to ensure that the constants k1, k2, and k3 are appropriately defined to achieve a valid solution. Proper integration techniques are crucial for accurately determining distance and time.
vladgrigore
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello,

having given 2 speeds v1 and v2 and the equation: k1*v'=k2-k3*v^{2} how do i compute the distance traveled from v1 reaching v2 and the time needed. (k1,k2,k3 are constants).

i think i have to integrate to find the distance, but i just can't figure quite how to do it.

any tips are greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find a function for velocity v(t). You can integrate v(t) to find the distance. To obtain this function, you can solve your differential equation using separation of variables:

k_{1}\frac{dv}{dt}=k_{2}-k_{3}v^{2} \implies k_{1}\frac{dv}{k_{2}-k_{3}v^{2}} = dt
 
And you can use "partial fractions" to integrate that: k_1- k_2v^2= \left(\sqrt{k_1}- \sqrt{k_2}v\right)\left(\sqrt{k_1}+ \sqrt{k_2}\right)
 
thanks for that, i managed to figure out the integral but sadly it does not converge given the constants that i have.
thanks again
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top