Concept Design/Comic Project Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Duckwagon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Project
AI Thread Summary
The project involves creating a scientifically inspired world with a secondary, semi-liquid atmosphere called 'Misora,' which is breathable and interacts similarly to our gaseous atmosphere. The aim is to maintain a balance between scientific accuracy and creative flair, prioritizing the aesthetic and immersive qualities of the setting. Key features of Misora include its surface tension, which allows for unique interactions with air and water, creating effects like decreased gravity and bubble formations. The atmosphere exhibits a color gradient similar to water, with a fish-eye effect that distorts light and creates a mirrored horizon. This environment allows for phenomena such as rainbows without rain and potential auroras due to charged currents within the liquid.The project raises questions about visibility of celestial objects through this semi-liquid atmosphere and how it would alter the perception of stars and other astronomical features. Overall, the focus is on crafting a visually stunning and immersive world while exploring the implications of its unique physical properties.
Duckwagon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I'm no physics expert, by no means.
But I'm working on a project that involves some weird physics elements, and I'd like it to be scientifically accurate; (if somewhat pseudo-scientific or liberally applied for flavor) and I'd like some feedback and help. The goal, in other words, isn't to be exactly scientifically accurate; but I'd like it to be close enough without destroying the flavor and setting and awesomeness...? If that makes sense. And I'll mainly be talking on points I don't quite understand.

Put basically, the premise is a world where there is a secondary, semi-liquid atmosphere where most life exists.
Chemically, it's the same as (or interacts as similarly as possible as) our normal gaseous atmosphere.
But mechanically, physically, it exists in a stable liquid state.
Codename: 'Misora', Japanese for 'Sea-Sky'

The effect I'm trying to produce is such that it's similar to living underwater, but it's breathable, burnable, similarly soluble, etc. But however I justify it, priority will probably go to how cool it is, and I prefer to fudge something a little if it just makes it unlivable. Because that's much less cool. Unexpected ramifications are bonus points.

There is also an outer gaseous atmosphere, but aside from being a little more volatile, less uv protection, etc. it's pretty much the same. Just enough that it's not quite as suitable for life; less moderate, more arid, etc. So I won't really explore that much yet. (Comes much later in the story, in other words.)

That make sense to you?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First topic:
Fundamental differences.

0) I need a name for this substance... it's getting tiring. My current code-name is 'Misora', the japanese word for sky-sea. But I don't like it as much.

1) It creates surface tension between both air and water, and is only dense enough to still be considered a liquid. This creates an effect with water sort of like decreased gravity; say, if you're ringing out a rag in space, it will create a bubble of water around the rag. In other words, it's just a titch 'stickier' to itself than you would see normally?
ISS_Hadfield_water_facecloth_lets_talk_science_curiocity.jpg

2015-02-10 13.27.53.jpg

And most gases soluble with air would similarly be soluble with misora; so most wouldn't appear as bubbles, or would dissolve into it as it rises.
2) The sky:
  • I see a deeper color shift happening over distance, as you'd see in water. I imagine more greenish, to deeper blue. I'd like it to be just far enough to make out the horizon, on a very clear day.
Fish-eye:
  • I also see a sort of 'fish-eye' effect, like you get when looking up underwater. Basically, where at anything beyond around 40 degrees light starts to bounce off of the surface of the water, creating a mirror effect; except for a circle above your head, which distorts the light so you can see the entire horizon from that point. (If it wasn't too distorted to make out, that is.)
    n_Arnold,_assigned_to_Mobile_Diving_and_Salvage_Unit_2,_snorkels_on_the_surface_to_monitor_multi.jpg
  • The difference here is that (a) it's less dense than water, (b) less opaque than water, and (c) you're looking up at a grand sphere, instead of a mostly flat surface. Because of this, the angle of reflection would be much wider, to the point where just above the color-shift haze on the horizon, you get a mirrored band, which on sunset/sunrise would reflect that light; or at night, might reflect more purely the moonlight, or reflective light from the surface. A shimmering, starry band, if you will.
    2015-02-10 13.58.03.jpg
  • As well, I can imagine with especially huge waves above you, you could also see a mirror ripple across the sky.
Other Cool Things:
  • You could see rainbows without rain, at the right angle. I'd imagine at high noon, you would see a big circle.
  • I imagine an aurora effect might be visible... Not due to solar flares, but rather due to what I imagine is basically a charged current. Say a saline-like current, that conducts or holds a charge better than normal misora?
Questions:
  • Would you be able to see stars, or other celestial objects? How would it affect your view of them?
 
Last edited:
A map of a four-dimensional planet is three dimensional, so such can exist in our Universe. I made one and posted a video to the Internet. This is all based on William Kingdon Clifford's math from the 19th century. It works like this. A 4D planet has two perpendicular planes of rotation. The intersection of such a plane with the surface of the planet is a great circle. We can define latitude as the arctan( distance from one plane/distance from the other plane). The set of all points...
Back
Top