Concept of a renormalizable theory in Weinberg's feild theory book

nughret
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I have just started to study the concept of a renormalizable theory in Weinberg's field theory book. I am not sure if my understanding of the process is correct and would like some additional explanation or corrections; As far as I understand in any theory there will be unrenormalizable interactions, however these infinities will be removed if we add all possible interactions allowed by gauge and lorentz symmetry to the lagrangian. I firstly don't understand how this process exactly works.
Secondly it appears to me that it is then claimed that even in an unrenormalizable theory such a lagrangian will lead to finite interaction terms and this part i really don't get, but i am not sure if i have just misunderstood this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


nughret said:
As far as I understand in any theory there will be unrenormalizable interactions

No, in a renormalizable theory, there are no nonrenormalizable interactions.

Weinberg is not the best place to start. I suggest Srednicki.
 


Weinberg is probably referring to dimension >4 terms that generically do appear (they are consistent with gauge and lorentz invariance). These of course are nonrenormalizable, though heavily suppressed by some large mass scale and so can be safely integrated out in an effective theory.
 


Avodyne said:
Weinberg is not the best place to start. I suggest Srednicki.
I agree. Personally, I suggest A. Zee, "QFT in a nutshell".
 


Thanks I will have a look into these books, i was wondering though if anyone had a source that was aimed at renormalization specifically rather than the entire basics of field theory
 


nughret said:
Thanks I will have a look into these books, i was wondering though if anyone had a source that was aimed at renormalization specifically rather than the entire basics of field theory
There is such a textbook: Collins "Renormalization".
But it makes sense to read it only if you are already familiar with other basics of QFT.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top