Concept of Moment of Inertia and its limits of integration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a rotating rod and a solid cylinder, specifically addressing the limits of integration. For the rod, the integration limits are correctly set from L/2 to -L/2. In contrast, the cylinder's limits should start from 0 to R, with the angular coordinate varying from 0 to 2π to cover the entire volume. The integration accounts for the cylindrical shape by incorporating the volume element, which includes the angular component. This clarification helps in understanding the integration process for both shapes.
Yam
Messages
32
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am trying to work the moment of inertia for

a) rotating rod, axis through the centre of the rod
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi2.html#irod3

b) Solid cylinder
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/icyl.html#icyl2
[/B]

Homework Equations


I = R^2 dM

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand all of the steps, except the limits of integration in terms of R or L.

For the rod, the limit of integration is from L/2 to -L/2

Why is the limit of integration for the cylinder from R to 0?
Should it be from the end to end? R to -R?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to fix your integration limits such that you integrate over the entire body once. In the case of the cylinder, you integrate from zero, but you allow the angular coordinate to vary between zero and 2pi, thus covering the full lap.
 
Orodruin said:
but you allow the angular coordinate to vary between zero and 2pi
I don't quite understand this part, when did i allow the angular coordinate to vary between zero and 2pi? What is meant by the angular coordinate?
 
It is implicit when you multiply by 2pi in ##dV = 2\pi L r dr##. The integral is really a volume integral, but the direction along the cylinder axis and the angular direction are trivial since the integrand does not depend on them, thus they are replaced by the size of their integration ranges, ##L## and ##2\pi##, respectively.
 
I understand now, thank you for your help! cheers.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top