I Concepts to understand Quantum Tunneling

SameerTahir
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
What concepts should be cleared to better understand quantum tunneling?.
 
  • Like
Likes Tio Barnabe
Physics news on Phys.org
SameerTahir said:
What concepts should be cleared to better understand quantum tunneling?.

This is a very vague question.

At what level do you wish to understand this "quantum tunneling"? Understanding it at the intro QM course is different than understanding it at the graduate level/research level.

The prerequisite for an undergraduate QM class is a very good start to know what is needed to understand intro quantum tunneling.

Zz.
 
At undergraduate level.
 
SameerTahir said:
At undergraduate level.

Then I've given you an answer.

Zz.
 
Basically, they are the concepts of energy (kinetic and potential) , and the concept of potential barrier, and the principle of conservation of energy. Also must understand differential equations (the schrodinger equation is used at the introductory level) and also understand very well the concept of the quantum mechanical wave function that appears in schrodinger equation.

The potential barrier means that in order for something to cross the barrier and due to the conservation of energy, must have energy (kinetic+potential) greater or equal to the energy level of the potential barrier. But it turns out that this is only if you treat the problem classically.

However using quantum mechanics and the schrodinger equation one can show that a particle can cross (to be more accurate, and having in mind the probabilistic interpretation of the quantum mechanical wave function, that the probability to find a particle with lower energy than the energy level of the barrier, at the other side of the barrier, is not zero as we would expect classically but it is positive (however small but positive)) the barrier having energy lower than that of the potential barrier and without violating conservation of energy.
 
  • Like
Likes SameerTahir
SameerTahir said:
At undergraduate level.
The thread level tag has been corrected accordingly.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top