Conceptual question: how do we even see objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnj7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual even
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the fundamental question of how we perceive objects through light. It explains that objects absorb some light and reflect the rest, which then travels to our eyes, allowing us to see them. The process involves the interaction of light with surfaces, where color perception is based on the amount of light reflected. While the basic mechanics of light absorption and reflection are understood, the complexities of human perception and image processing are acknowledged as more intricate. Overall, the conversation highlights the relationship between light, objects, and visual perception.
johnj7
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


n/a


Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


n/a

In my physics class we are learning about the EM radiation/wave nature of light/wave optics / image formation by mirrors and lenses, and I had a general question that was not really discussed in the textbook.
I understand the "technical aspects" such as understanding the equations and concepts/ how images are formed with mirrors and lenses etc, but what is exactly going on with the objects? How do we even see things in the first place?
seems like a dumb question, but I'm not sure of the answer

for example, suppose we have an object and a convex mirror
for the ray diagram we would draw rays coming from the object and reflecting off the mirror, forming an image.
are these rays coming from the object? where do these rays come from?
is the answer that the object absorbs solar radiation but doesn't absorb all the light, then the light that isn't absorbed by the object travels to the mirror and is reflected off?

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell that is correct. The light from the sun hit's the object. The object absorbs some of the light. The rest is reflected off of it and then will hit the mirrors surface which will in turn reflect the light to your eyes...thus you see the object.
 
johnj7 said:
In my physics class we are learning about the EM radiation/wave nature of light/wave optics / image formation by mirrors and lenses, and I had a general question that was not really discussed in the textbook.
I understand the "technical aspects" such as understanding the equations and concepts/ how images are formed with mirrors and lenses etc, but what is exactly going on with the objects? How do we even see things in the first place?
seems like a dumb question, but I'm not sure of the answer

for example, suppose we have an object and a convex mirror
for the ray diagram we would draw rays coming from the object and reflecting off the mirror, forming an image.
are these rays coming from the object? where do these rays come from?
is the answer that the object absorbs solar radiation but doesn't absorb all the light, then the light that isn't absorbed by the object travels to the mirror and is reflected off?

thank you!

What you have described is absorption/reflection and is how objects project color. White reflects all the light, black then little. But of course how we actually see - process photons, perceive relationships, integrate images, structure, etc is a much more complicated organic process than appropriate for here.
 
pretty much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top