Conclusion for seeing the infinitely small

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the importance of observing the infinitely small, particularly through microscopes and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Understanding the fundamental building blocks of matter, such as quarks and electrons, is essential for comprehending the universe. Observing these tiny particles can lead to answers about fundamental questions regarding the nature of matter and its interactions. The conclusion emphasizes that to grasp the complexities of the universe, one must first understand its smallest components. This exploration of the infinitely small is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge.
jimmypantspants
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I need to write a conclusion for a presentation I'm doing on "Seeing the infinitely small" (translation from french), which is basically about microscopes and the LHC, how to observe the different levels of small and all that... What can I write to answer, "why are we trying to observe the infinitely small ?" I wrote something about understanding our universe and all that but can't i write something about how quarks can lead to the answers of fundamental questions etc.. .? It's in french by the way so just bullet points, no need to write a whole paragraph
Idk if this is the correct place for this but thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to fully understand something, you have to understand its pieces first. To find the fundamental building blocks of matter, or of our universe in general, you have to look at the smallest things. Quarks are among the smallest particles we can observe.
The matter around us is made out of quarks, electrons and their interactions.
 
mfb said:
If you want to fully understand something, you have to understand its pieces first. To find the fundamental building blocks of matter, or of our universe in general, you have to look at the smallest things. Quarks are among the smallest particles we can observe.
The matter around us is made out of quarks, electrons and their interactions.
cheers mate, this answer helped me a lot :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top