Which Textbook is Best for Self-Studying Condensed Matter Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Self-studying condensed matter physics can be effectively approached using popular textbooks like Kittel and Ashcroft & Mermin (A&M). While Kittel is more affordable and serves as a decent introduction, it may lack clarity, particularly in its 8th edition, which contains some typos not found in the 7th. For those with a background in Quantum Mechanics from Griffiths, Kittel is considered manageable if read carefully, paving the way for a deeper understanding through A&M. Additionally, "Principles of Condensed Matter Physics" by Chaikin & Lubensky is recommended for a more advanced treatment, and "Solid State Physics" by A.J. Dekker is noted for being well-organized and simpler than Kittel. Overall, Kittel is a suitable starting point for self-study, with other texts available for further exploration.
Atomos
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
I wish to self study condensed matter physics. I believe the Kittel and Arschcroft&Mermin are the most popular textbooks. I have read that Kittel is not very clear, however it his half the price of A&M on amazon. Also, my background in Quantum Mechanics comes entirely from Griffiths' intro, and its treatment of periodic potentials and band theory was limited to a simple one dimensional example. Might either of the two textbooks be too advanced for my background in QM? Are there any other good textbooks?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Atomos said:
I wish to self study condensed matter physics. I believe the Kittel and Arschcroft&Mermin are the most popular textbooks. I have read that Kittel is not very clear, however it his half the price of A&M on amazon. Also, my background in Quantum Mechanics comes entirely from Griffiths' intro, and its treatment of periodic potentials and band theory was limited to a simple one dimensional example. Might either of the two textbooks be too advanced for my background in QM? Are there any other good textbooks?

coincidentally, i spent today perusing through omar's elementary solid state physics, and it looks to be pretty good.
 
Kittel is a nice introduction to the subject (and at roughly the right level if you understand quantum mechanics at the level of Griffiths's text) if you read the text carefully and work through every derivation. This is especially true if you're using the 8th edition, as it has some (generally obvious) typos that are not present in the 7th edition. :confused: After a careful reading of Kittel, you will be well prepared to tackle the more sophisticated and general treatment of the same topics in Ashcroft & Mermin. For condensed matter physics beyond the solid state, I believe Principles of Condensed Matter Physics by Chaikin & Lubensky is the standard text.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the input, guys. I will go with Kittel.
 
Atomos said:
I wish to self study condensed matter physics. I believe the Kittel and Arschcroft&Mermin are the most popular textbooks. I have read that Kittel is not very clear, however it his half the price of A&M on amazon. Also, my background in Quantum Mechanics comes entirely from Griffiths' intro, and its treatment of periodic potentials and band theory was limited to a simple one dimensional example. Might either of the two textbooks be too advanced for my background in QM? Are there any other good textbooks?

I really like "Principles of Condensed Matter Physics" by Chaikin and Lubensky.
 
you could try out a.j.dekker, solid state physics... simple but good and more organised than kittel...
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top