Condition for Phase transition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the existence of a phase transition in the 2D Ising model without an external field using Peierl's argument. A key point raised is the condition that for some δ > 0, the probability of the state at the origin being -1 must be less than or equal to 1/2 - δ as the volume approaches the infinite lattice. The connection between this condition and the average magnetization being non-zero in the infinite limit is emphasized as crucial for understanding the phase transition. The mathematical nature of the course material complicates the application of Peierl's argument to practical examples. Overall, the discussion highlights the interplay between theoretical conditions and their implications for phase transitions in statistical mechanics.
JorisL
Messages
489
Reaction score
189
Hi

I'm trying to use Peierl's argument which in essence is clear to prove that there does exist a phase transition in the 2D Ising model without external field.
The issue I'm having is of a more mathematical nature, in class it was mentioned that there is a phase transition if for some ##\delta > 0##, the probability ##\mathbb{P}_V^+[\sigma_0 = -1] \leq \frac{1}{2}-\delta## uniform as ##V\uparrow\mathbb{Z}^2##.
Let me clarify the notation, we are looking at a finite subvolume V of the square lattice.
The superscript specifies the boundary conditions, all + in this case. And ##\sigma_0## is the state of the site at the origin.

I don't see why this is true, is it because in that case the average magnetisation is non-zero when going to the infinite lattice?
I've been able to follow through the Peierl's argument which is pretty nifty as is, but the sometimes very mathematical approach we used in the course makes it hard to couple back to the examples.

Thanks,

Joris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JorisL said:
is it because in that case the average magnetisation is non-zero when going to the infinite lattice?

I have confirmed that this exactly justifies the claim.
I hate moments like these when something seems too good/simple to be true.

Joris
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top