Kinetica said:
I see what you mean. My mistake is that I did not consider to multiply the probabilities by corresponding values.
Then, my question is. Some problems that I solved earlier were easily solved by using tables like this. How do I distinguish which method to use?
Table, trees, formulas, whatever---they all say the same thing, perhaps in disguised form. There is no single right way: do whatever makes you fee comfortable.
Let's compute P(D) = prob item is defective.
(1) Formula: P(D) = P(D|I)*P(I) + P(D|II)*P(II) = (.08)*(.60)+(.10)*(.40) = 0.0.088
(2) Table: Say we make 1,000,000 items.
No. produced in Line I = (0.60)(1,000,000) = 600,000
No. produced in Line II = (0.40)(1,000,000) = 400,000
Of the 600,000 produced on LI, the number defective = (.08)(600,000) = 48,000
Of the 400,000 produced on LII the number defective = (.10)(400,000) = 40,000
Putting these in a table we have:
Total Defect Non-defect
Line I items 600,000 48,000 552,000
Line II items 400,000 40 000 360,000
Total 1,000,000 88,000 912,000
Thus, P(D) = 88,000/1,000,000 = 88/1000 = 0.088.
You can also do it in a tree, but I can't easily draw a tree here.
RGV