Conditions on Christoffel Symbols?

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Write down the geodesic equation. For ##x^0 = c\tau## and ##x^i = constant##, find the condition on the christoffel symbols ##\Gamma^\mu~_{\alpha \beta}##. Show these conditions always work when the metric is of the form ##ds^2 = -c^2dt^2 +g_{ij}dx^idx^j##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The geodesic equation is:
\frac{d^2x^\mu}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma^\mu~_{\alpha \beta} \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\beta}{d\tau}

Using the condition given
\Gamma^0~_{\alpha \beta} \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\beta}{d\tau} = 0
\Gamma^0~_{00} = \Gamma^i~_{00} = 0

How do I show the metric is of the form ##ds^2 = -c^2dt^2 +g_{ij}dx^idx^j##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:
How do I show the metric is of the form ##ds^2 = -c^2dt^2 +g_{ij}dx^idx^j##?
But is that the question? Aren't you simply being asked to show that such a metric does satisfy those conditions on ##\Gamma## ?
 
strangerep said:
But is that the question? Aren't you simply being asked to show that such a metric does satisfy those conditions on ##\Gamma## ?

If ##x^i = constant##, then wouldn't ##dx^i = 0##?
 
unscientific said:
If ##x^i = constant##, then wouldn't ##dx^i = 0##?
Yes, but I'm puzzled why you replied to my question this way. Just write the formula for the Chrisoffel symbols, and substitute the metric components that appear in the given line element ##ds^2##.
 
strangerep said:
Yes, but I'm puzzled why you replied to my question this way. Just write the formula for the Chrisoffel symbols, and substitute the metric components that appear in the given line element ##ds^2##.

What do you mean by "substitute the metric components that appear in the given line element ##ds^2##"?
 
unscientific said:
What do you mean by "substitute the metric components that appear in the given line element ##ds^2##"?
Which part of my sentence are you having trouble with? The word "substitute"? The word "metric"? The concept of metric components appearing a line element?

If the last one, then read this Wiki page.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top