Conditions on the coefficients of conics equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies how the coefficients in the general conic equation Ax^2 + Cy^2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0 determine the type of conic section represented. A circle occurs when A equals C, while an ellipse requires A not equal to C with both coefficients positive. A hyperbola is identified by the condition that AC is less than zero, indicating opposite signs, and a parabola arises when either A or C equals zero, resulting in only one squared term. The conversation also emphasizes that the presence of two squared terms in circles, ellipses, and hyperbolas creates distinct shapes, while a single squared term in parabolas allows them to be functions. The general form can also extend to include a Bxy term for conics with axes at angles to the coordinate axes.
cocoavi
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have been taught that the equation Ax^2 + Cy^2 +Dx + Ey +F = 0 represents a general form of conics.

Then the conditions of the coefficients in the equation could identify which type of conics the equation represents...

Circle: A=C
Ellipse: A does not=C and AC>0
Hyperbola: AC<0 and if the coefficients have opposite signs
Parabola: A=0 OR C=0

The thing that I do not understand is why... I was wondering if anyone knows a way to explain the reasons to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't knew about that but it's very interesting. Let's prove it for the circle. We are used to the equation of a circle of radius R centered at (a, b) to be

(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2 = R^2

right?

Ok, well if A = C, our cameleonic forumla becomes

Ax^2 + Ay^2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0

x^2 + y^2 + \frac{D}{A}x + \frac{E}{A}y + \frac{F}{A} = 0

Now notice that

(x + D/2A)^2 = x^2 + \frac{D}{A}x + (D/2A)^2

and

(y + E/2A)^2 = y^2 + \frac{E}{A}y + (E/2A)^2

So

x^2 + y^2 + \frac{D}{A}x + \frac{E}{A}y + \frac{F}{A} = (x + D/2A)^2 + (y + E/2A)^2 - (D/2A)^2 - (E/2A)^2 + F/A = 0

(x + D/2A)^2 + (y + E/2A)^2 = (D/2A)^2 + (E/2A)^2 - F/A

This is the equation of a circle centered at (-D/2A, -E/2A) and whose radius is \sqrt{(D/2A)^2 + (E/2A)^2 - F/A}

The other proofs are probably similar.
 
:bugeye: whoa... You're really smart to be able to get all of those... but I'm very sorry to say that I don't think I understand it. When the tutor explained it was very simple, it's just that when I got home and started on the homework that I got all confused... :cry: And since I'm only starting on the conics stuff I don't think I would be able to go into more equation proofs. If it's not too rude to ask would it be alright if I get a more simple reason? Say for example the one that I know would be the parabola:

Since x-h=a(y-k)^2 is the equation for the vertical parabola, A in that conics equation would have to equal to 0 because there is no x^2 when you expand x-h=a(y-k)^2.

And since y-k=a(x-h)^2 is the equation for a horizontal parabola, C in that conics equation would have to equal to 0 because there is no y^2 when you expand y-k=a(x-h)^2.

I hope it's not too much of a problem I hope to get something simple like that.. and sorry again ><!
 
For a parabola, only one squared term is present, either on the x or y. The fact that there is only one squared term in that general form is what generates the parabola, which could be considered a function if the parabola is not turned on its side.

Think of the other three conic sections as consisting of two parts which open either towards each other (circle, ellipse) due to the x^2 and y^2 terms having the same signs or away from each other (hyperbola) due to the x^2 and y^2 terms having opposite signs. Since there are two parts to the other three conic sections, the equation that represent either of those three conic sections can't be considered as functions.
 
Strictly speaking Ax^2 + Cy^2 +Dx + Ey +F = 0 is the general form for a conic section with axes parallel to the coordinate axes. A general conic can have axes at angles to the coordinate axes- that will give the general formula
Ax^2 + Bxy+ Cy^2 +Dx + Ey +F = 0
(Didn't you wonder why they skipped over B?)
 
ooh~ those helped me understand more ^^. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top