Conducting planes in magnetostatics

shehry1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two infinitely long perfectly conducting planes at x = 0 and y = 0 form a boundary on the upper right quadrant (x > 0, y > 0). A magnetic dipole m = m_x + m_y [with their corresponding unit vectors] is located at at (x', y', z' = 0) in the upper right quadrant. Find the magnetic field everywhere in the upper right quadrant.

Now I think that I can solve the problem using method of images and the usual boundary conditions for normal B and tangential H. But what is the actual significance of conducting plates for magnetostatics?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
shehry1 said:
Now I think that I can solve the problem using method of images and the usual boundary conditions for normal B and tangential H. But what is the actual significance of conducting plates for magnetostatics?
You answered your own question in the previous sentence. :)
 
turin said:
You answered your own question in the previous sentence. :)

Well. To put it in another way. How would the boundary conditions change in case the sheets were made out of dielectrics. As far as I understand, there cannot be any difference.

Thanks a lot for answering. I had given up on it.
 
I will assume that you meant permeable material instead of dielectric. The dielectric boundary conditions on the magnetic field are trivial. What is the image of a magnetic dipole in a perfectly conducting surface? What is the image of a magnetic dipole in the surface of a permeable material? Do you have a textbook? The answers to these questions can be found in Jackson (with a little persistence).
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top