Conducting planes in magnetostatics

shehry1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two infinitely long perfectly conducting planes at x = 0 and y = 0 form a boundary on the upper right quadrant (x > 0, y > 0). A magnetic dipole m = m_x + m_y [with their corresponding unit vectors] is located at at (x', y', z' = 0) in the upper right quadrant. Find the magnetic field everywhere in the upper right quadrant.

Now I think that I can solve the problem using method of images and the usual boundary conditions for normal B and tangential H. But what is the actual significance of conducting plates for magnetostatics?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
shehry1 said:
Now I think that I can solve the problem using method of images and the usual boundary conditions for normal B and tangential H. But what is the actual significance of conducting plates for magnetostatics?
You answered your own question in the previous sentence. :)
 
turin said:
You answered your own question in the previous sentence. :)

Well. To put it in another way. How would the boundary conditions change in case the sheets were made out of dielectrics. As far as I understand, there cannot be any difference.

Thanks a lot for answering. I had given up on it.
 
I will assume that you meant permeable material instead of dielectric. The dielectric boundary conditions on the magnetic field are trivial. What is the image of a magnetic dipole in a perfectly conducting surface? What is the image of a magnetic dipole in the surface of a permeable material? Do you have a textbook? The answers to these questions can be found in Jackson (with a little persistence).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top