Conformal symmetry of FRW spacetime

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conformal symmetry of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric, highlighting its implications for the Universe's physical characteristics. The standard FRW metric demonstrates spatial homogeneity and isotropy, while a reformulation using conformal time reveals a symmetry that stretches time and space equally. This conformal symmetry suggests that photons, which follow conformally invariant Maxwell's equations, may propagate with constant energy and frequency. The concept raises questions about the nature of redshift, proposing that it could be linked to the increasing energy scales as the Universe expands. Ultimately, using conformal time in local physics could introduce unnecessary complexity due to factors dependent on the scale factor.
jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
The standard spatially flat FRW metric in Cartesian co-moving co-ordinates is given by:

$$ds^2=dt^2-a(t)^2(dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)$$
As far as I understand it the fact that the metric can be written in a form that is independent of ##x,y,z## implies that the Universe has the physical qualities of being spatially homogeneous and isotropic.

But by writing the FRW metric in another way one can see that the Universe has another symmetry.

$$ds^2 = a(t)^2(\frac{dt^2}{a(t)^2}-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2)$$

If we introduce conformal time ##\tau## defined by:

$$d\tau = \frac{dt}{a(t)}$$

we get:

$$ds^2 = a(\tau)^2(d\tau^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2)$$
This way of writing the metric displays a conformal symmetry: it stretches equally in (conformal) time and space.

What physical quality does this conformal symmetry imply for the Universe?

Here are some of my speculations:

Photons obey Maxwell's source free equations which are conformally invariant.

Does the conformal symmetry of the FRW metric imply that photons actually propagate with constant energy/frequency?

Maybe the time we actually measure is conformal time and the redshift that we see is due to our energy scales increasing with the age of the Universe. If expanding photon wavelengths have constant energy then as our atoms have a fixed size their energies will increase with the scale of the Universe.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The time we actually measure is the integral ##\int ds## of the metric over a path where ##dx = dy = dz = 0##. So in these coordinates, ##s = \int a(\tau)d\tau = \int dt##.

Essentially, if we were to use conformal time to do physics in local systems, we'd end up with a whole bunch of extraneous factors that depend upon ##a(\tau)## that unnecessarily complicate the equations.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top