Conformal Transformation for Perpendicular Charged Sheets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a conformal transformation for analyzing the electrostatic potential and charge density of two perpendicular charged sheets. The user has experience with parallel sheets but seeks a method to simplify the perpendicular configuration. Suggestions include using the method of images, although concerns arise regarding the lack of symmetry in this scenario. The possibility of representing the line of charge as a sum of infinite point charges is also considered. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of applying traditional methods to this unique geometric arrangement.
Morto
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
sheet.JPG

So, I've solved many problems involving parallel sheets of conductors (finite, semi-infinite, and infinite) and also finite sheets at a given angle to each other. I can post the results to these if it may be useful, but I'm more interested in sheets that are perpendicular.

Consider a semi-infinite sheet at
<br /> a\leq x &lt; \infty , y = 0<br />
and a perpenciular sheet
<br /> -\infty &lt; y &lt; \infty , x = 0<br />

I'm struggling to find a conformal transformation that will map this problem onto some region (like two infinite parallel lines), from which I can more easily calculate the electrostatic potential and charge density on both sheets.

Any ideas?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You ought to use an image charge, also known as the method of images.
 
How? That works with the symmetry of parallell plates, but there is no such symmetry here.
 
Can I consider the line of charge as a sum over an infinite number of point charges?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top