Confused about answer key's solution to a work/energy problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics801
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the solution to a work/energy problem in a physics placement exam. The original poster questions why the solution manual uses (x_{max} - x) instead of (x - x_{max}) when calculating work done against gravity on a ramp. Clarification is provided that the choice of positive direction is crucial; if gravity is considered negative along the slope, then the positive direction is up the slope, affecting the sign in the equation. The importance of consistently defining positive and negative directions in physics problems is emphasized, along with the necessity of checking the signs of results. Ultimately, the poster acknowledges the misunderstanding and appreciates the clarification.
physics801
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for my college's physics placement and I'm frustrated because I don't get the solution to problem 1d.

Homework Statement



The problem is here: http://ocw.edu.ht/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/exams/exam_2.pdf

Solution manual is here: http://ocw.edu.ht/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/exams/quiz2_sol.pdf

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a mspaint diagram of what I have: http://cl.ly/image/3b1o082l1k3a (x_{max} is defined in 1a, which is in the soln manual)

Basically since gravity is opposing the direction of travel (up the ramp), I think the solution to 1d(i) should be work=-mg(h-h_{max})=-mgsin\theta(x-x_{max}). However the solution manual has the same thing except x_{max}-x in the parentheses. Why is this? Shouldn't it be final - initial, which means x-x_{max} in the parentheses?

edit: I also have the same question for 1d(ii) and (iii) but hopefully it will be answered by explaining (i)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to decide which way is positive and stick to it.
If the force due to gravity is being taken as negative along the slope then the positive direction is up the slope. But x is measured down the slope, so it's (-x) - (-xmax)
It is always a good idea to sanity-check the sign of a result. It is clear that the work done by gravity here is negative.
 
Look at the direction of x, what does x mean in terms of the spring?
 
haruspex said:
You have to decide which way is positive and stick to it.
If the force due to gravity is being taken as negative along the slope then the positive direction is up the slope. But x is measured down the slope, so it's (-x) - (-xmax)
It is always a good idea to sanity-check the sign of a result. It is clear that the work done by gravity here is negative.

Oh whoops, I completely missed that. Thanks for the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top