Confused about invariant mass in particle collision

iacephysics
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Ok, when you use positrons to shoot at stationary electrons in a collider with enough energy so that you make a pair of proton and antiproton. The total energy of the pair would be E = T + MC^2, where M is the total invariance mass of the pair, namely 2*938Mev, or I can use E^2 = (pc)^2 + (Mc^2)^2, and M here is still the invariant mass. I got the correct answer using M = 2 times the mass of the rest mass of a proton, as said previous, 2*938 Mev. What I am trying to understand here is why the invariant mass here is the sum of two masses, when in most cases, invariant mass is not linear, you can't add two masses and conserve the sum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iacephysics said:
Ok, when you use positrons to shoot at stationary electrons in a collider with enough energy so that you make a pair of proton and antiproton. The total energy of the pair would be E = T + MC^2, where M is the total invariance mass of the pair, namely 2*938Mev, or I can use E^2 = (pc)^2 + (Mc^2)^2, and M here is still the invariant mass. I got the correct answer using M = 2 times the mass of the rest mass of a proton, as said previous, 2*938 Mev. What I am trying to understand here is why the invariant mass here is the sum of two masses, when in most cases, invariant mass is not linear, you can't add two masses and conserve the sum.
I am not sure what you are asking.
E=T+2Mc^2 is just a definition of T. It is appropriate to use the sum of the masses there because E=2Mc^2 when T=0.
In E^2=(pc)^2+(Mc^2)^2, the M is the mass of one proton.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top