MHB Confused about law of total variance

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a confusion regarding the law of total variance in a lottery problem involving different states based on die rolls. The original poster calculated the expected value and variance directly and found discrepancies when applying the law of total variance. After some back-and-forth, it was revealed that a calculation error occurred in determining E(Var(X|S)), which was corrected to 328333.33, aligning the results. The final calculations confirmed that the law of total variance holds true in this scenario. The thread highlights the importance of careful calculations in probability problems.
Probabilist1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I got this question on an exam some time ago and I still don't understand why I didn't get it (I can't remember the exact question, but this is very similar):

"A lottery winning amount is determined in the following manner: first a die is thrown. If the result is 1 or 2, the lottery machine is set to state A. If the result is 3 or 4, the machine is set to state B. If it is 5 or 6, the machine is set to C. Now in state A, the lottery amount is 500 with probability 0.2, 1000 with probability 0.5, 2000 with probability 0.3. In state B, the amount is 500 with probability 0.3, 1000 with probability 0.4, 2000 with probability 0.3. In state C, the amount is 500 with pr. 0.1, 1000 with pr. 0.3, 2000 with pr. 0.6. Determine the *variance* of the amount" (yes, it's a long question...)

Doing this directly (i.e. using probabilities (1/3)(0.2+0.3+0.1) for 500, etc.) I get E(amount)=1300 and Var(amount)=360000

However, if I try using the law of total variance by conditioning on the state, I get a different result. Letting S represent the lottery state and X the amount,

E(X|S)=1200 if S=A, 1150 if S=B, 1550 if S=C
Var(X|S)=310000 if S=A, 352500 if S=B, 322500 if S=C
E(E(X|S))=1300
Var(E(X|S))=31666.66
E(Var(X|S))=328166.66

From the law of total variance, we should have Var(X)=E(Var(X|S))+Var(E(X|S)) right? But that gives 31666.66+328166.66=359833.33 which is not 360000... am I doing a stupid calculation mistake somewhere??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Probabilist, (Wave)

Welcome to MHB!

I get the same thing when doing this the "direct way", as you put it. :)

Can you show your work for how you calculated Var(X|S)?
 
Oops... I was sure I double-checked all my work, but it seems I made a calculation error when calculating E(Var(X|S)), correct value is 328333.33 which works out. Very sorry, I don't make that kind of mistake usually.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K