Confused about law of total variance

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Probabilist1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Law Variance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the law of total variance in a lottery problem involving conditional probabilities based on die rolls. The user initially calculated the variance of the lottery winnings directly as 360,000 but encountered discrepancies when applying the law of total variance. After reviewing calculations for conditional expectations and variances, the correct value for E(Var(X|S)) was identified as 328,333.33, resolving the inconsistency. This highlights the importance of meticulous calculation in probability theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability distributions and expected values
  • Familiarity with the law of total variance
  • Knowledge of conditional probability
  • Basic skills in statistical calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the law of total variance in detail
  • Practice calculating conditional expectations and variances
  • Explore examples of probability distributions in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about common pitfalls in statistical calculations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students in statistics, data analysts, and anyone interested in mastering probability theory and variance calculations.

Probabilist1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I got this question on an exam some time ago and I still don't understand why I didn't get it (I can't remember the exact question, but this is very similar):

"A lottery winning amount is determined in the following manner: first a die is thrown. If the result is 1 or 2, the lottery machine is set to state A. If the result is 3 or 4, the machine is set to state B. If it is 5 or 6, the machine is set to C. Now in state A, the lottery amount is 500 with probability 0.2, 1000 with probability 0.5, 2000 with probability 0.3. In state B, the amount is 500 with probability 0.3, 1000 with probability 0.4, 2000 with probability 0.3. In state C, the amount is 500 with pr. 0.1, 1000 with pr. 0.3, 2000 with pr. 0.6. Determine the *variance* of the amount" (yes, it's a long question...)

Doing this directly (i.e. using probabilities (1/3)(0.2+0.3+0.1) for 500, etc.) I get E(amount)=1300 and Var(amount)=360000

However, if I try using the law of total variance by conditioning on the state, I get a different result. Letting S represent the lottery state and X the amount,

E(X|S)=1200 if S=A, 1150 if S=B, 1550 if S=C
Var(X|S)=310000 if S=A, 352500 if S=B, 322500 if S=C
E(E(X|S))=1300
Var(E(X|S))=31666.66
E(Var(X|S))=328166.66

From the law of total variance, we should have Var(X)=E(Var(X|S))+Var(E(X|S)) right? But that gives 31666.66+328166.66=359833.33 which is not 360000... am I doing a stupid calculation mistake somewhere??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Probabilist, (Wave)

Welcome to MHB!

I get the same thing when doing this the "direct way", as you put it. :)

Can you show your work for how you calculated Var(X|S)?
 
Oops... I was sure I double-checked all my work, but it seems I made a calculation error when calculating E(Var(X|S)), correct value is 328333.33 which works out. Very sorry, I don't make that kind of mistake usually.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K