Confused about the pressure formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two pressure formulas: p = p0 + rho*g*h and p = rho*g*d. The first formula accounts for the initial pressure, typically atmospheric pressure, while the second calculates only the pressure exerted by the fluid. The need for atmospheric pressure inclusion depends on whether the total pressure or just the fluid pressure is required. For a research submarine's maximum safe depth, the choice of formula hinges on whether the inward force from the water or the net inward force is considered. Ultimately, the recommendation leans towards using the formula without atmospheric pressure for calculations in this context.
jayadds
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've come across two different formulae for pressure:

p = p0 + rho*g*h (p0 = initial pressure)

OR

p = rho*g*d

My question is, why does one of the formulae includes the initial pressure (initial pressure is often the atmospheric pressure = 1.013*10^5 Pa) in the formula whereas the other one doesn't? Do they actual calculate the same thing?

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second version just gives the pressure due to the fluid (density rho). If you want the full pressure, you need to add the pressure above the fluid, p0.
 
Doc Al said:
The second version just gives the pressure due to the fluid (density rho). If you want the full pressure, you need to add the pressure above the fluid, p0.

Having said that, then for the following question should I use the formula with or without the atmospheric pressure?

A research submarine has a 20 cm diameter window. It can withstand forces up to 1.0 x 10^6 N. What is the submarine's maxiumum safe depth in water?
 
Depends. Do they mean the inward force from the water or the net inward force? (Presumably, the pressure inside the submarine is atmospheric.) Lacking additional information, I would use the one without the atmospheric pressure.
 
Personally, I'd use the 'pessimistic' version. But I may be just a wimp.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top