Confused about time dilain length contraction

teodorakis
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
hi, we all know when we derive the time dialtion formula we choose a vertical light clock, and basically since the light take a longer zig-zag path to the stationary observer, the time is dilated. That's ok but when deriving length contraction, firstly we accept time dilation for horizontal clock and then do some maths and derive the length contraction formula, so the horizontal clocks affected by both time dilation and length contraction, but what i want to ask is, does length contraction occurs as a result of time dilation?
I mean think of a vertical and a horizontal clock in a spaceship both in sync in that reference frame, now to an observer that has a speed v according to that ship these two clocks must dilate at the same rate by the postulate of relativity, they are not in sync though. Anyway i can understand they should all dely at the same rate, cause otherwise we have a detector of absolute motion, so no matter the choice of clock we use they should be all sync in an inertial reference frame(if we sync them of course). But when i want to mathematically want to derive the time dilaion in horizontal clock i have to accept the length contraction at first, i can't derive it alone, or like all of the sources did, time is dilated same rate as vertical clock adn from here derive thelegth contraction formula. I'm like in a vicious circle, can not derive one ithout other matheatically, please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In relativistic theory all physics laws are the same independent of the reference frame. When time dilates, so must length also change in order that the speed is preserved: speed = length / time.
 
let me clarify things, we don't need to know the machinery or principle of the other clocks, they have to delay asme rate as the vertical light clock, otherwisse the observer in the moving vehicle has a way of understanding that he is moving by using the mismatch in his clocks.
That's ok, but i am trying to derive the time dilation formula in the horizontal clock, just like we derive in vertical clcok, such that i only accept that the speed of light is constant for all observers, with just this assumption, i think we should be able to derive the time dilation alone, shouldn't we?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top