Confused by Relative Motion? Get Answers Here!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding relative motion, specifically the velocity of Car A moving east at 30 mph relative to Car B moving north at 30 mph. The confusion arises from the statement that both velocity components have the same magnitude, leading to an angle of 45 degrees between them. This angle is derived from the right triangle formed by the two velocity vectors, with the resultant vector pointing 45 degrees south of east, which corresponds to an angle of 315 degrees when measured counterclockwise from the east. Clarification is provided that the angle is relevant for understanding the vector's direction rather than being used directly in calculations. The importance of geometry in comprehending these concepts is emphasized, highlighting its relevance for future topics.
jwroblewski44
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Disclaimer: This is not for any class. I have downloaded this book ( http://www.ck12.org/book/CK-12-Physics---Intermediate/ ) and am ( attempting to (: ) work through it on my own. I am going through the section on relative motion ( section 3.3 in the book ) and am confused by a portion. It goes: (copy/pasted from book)

Car A is moving due east with a speed of 30 mph and Car B is moving due north with a speed of 30 mph.
a. What is the velocity of car A relative to car B?
Vab =~Va - Vb The two vectors are not along the same line so we’ll use their components
Va = (+30;0) and Vb = (0;+30), where east is +x and north is +y
-Vb = (0;-30), therefore, Va - Vb = (30+0;0-30) = (+30;-30). The components are directed east and south, so
the direction is southeast. Since both components have the same magnitude, the angle must be 45. But since the
vector is in the southeast direction it is in the 4th quadrant so the angle is 315, and the magnitude is the Pythagorean
sum (30[^]2 +30[^]2) [^]1/2 = 42:4 mph.

What is most confusing is when they state, "Since both components have the same magnitude, the angle must be 45." I see that both cars (vectors?) have the same magnitude (30mph?), but how does that mean "the angle must be 45"? And then they state that because the vector has a southeastern direction it is in the 4th quadrant, so the angle is 315... Where does the angle of 315 come into play at all? I see them state the angle then not use it directly in any formula.

Can someone help shine some light on this matter for me? Thanks in advance!

EDIT: It seems I have posted in the wrong area. Sorry :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, the vectors that are being referred to are the velocity vectors, which is different from an actual position vector. I couldn't tell if you were clear about this or not. Since the components are perpendicular to each other, the triangle that these velocity components make is a right triangle with the two smaller sides of equal length. Since the other angles are equal (there are a number of ways to show this), and the sum of the internal angles of a triangle equal 180##^{\circ}##, the two smaller angles must both be 45##^{\circ}##

Now, I'm assuming there is a picture that shows the two cars starting from the same point and traveling away from each other. From this picture and the other work that has been done, we see that the velocity vector is pointing 45##^{\circ}## south of east. This is the same as measuring 315##^{\circ}## anti-clockwise from east. Since this is a commonly used orientation, they ask you to put it in that form.

Does that clear it up? This stuff can be a bit annoying, but the geometry practice is very important for other topics.

I think that these should usually be in the classwork help even though it isn't for a class, but I'm not sure about that.
 
Thanks for the explanation! Pointing out the reference to a right triangle helped me to understand.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top