How Did They Derive Quantized Energy Levels in a 1D Atom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
The book I am using did a simple little algebra and it is showing the quantized energy levels of an electron in a one-dimensional atom of width 0.1nm.

They did this:

<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> E_n = n^2 \frac{{h^2 }}{{8ml^2 }} \\ <br /> E_n = n^2 \frac{{h^2 c^2 }}{{8mc^2 l^2 }} \\ <br /> E_n = n^2 \frac{{(1239.8eV*nm)^2 }}{{(8)(0.511*10^6 eV)(0.1nm)^2 }} \\ <br /> \end{array}

But where did the c^2 go on top?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The c has been put with the h to give something with units of [E][T]\frac{[L]}{[T]} = [E][L], and numerically h c = 1239.8 eV nm. This is one of those common estimation factors, although I remember it as \hbar c \sim 200 eV nm.
 
Last edited:
Oh ok i get why they did this. They have a conversion at the front of the book for hc = (1239.8eV*nm) that i didn't notice or make the connection to.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top