Confusion about Lorentz Transform

thrush
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I am new here, thought to join as I am trying to learn Relativity, in this case Special Relativity. I have solved a bunch of problems already but ...

The Lorentz Transform formulation I am dealing with is a 4x4 matrix. I understand the invariance of the spacetime interval and have solved it several times:

delta_s^2 = -(delta_t^2) + delta_x^2 ... delta_y, delta_z are zero.

What I don't get is that for any event in frame S, where delta_X (and delta_Y, delta_Z) = 0, and only delta_T is non-zero, I am the guy standing on the train station watching the train pass. Why then is the time in frame S', delta_t' never less than delta_t? It can't be because the denominator sqrt(1-B^2) can never be greater than 1!

How can the passing train's time interval delta_t' be greater than the 'stationary' observer? I thought a velocity like β=3/5C would make delta_t' in the train's inertial reference frame always delta_t' < delta_t?

Sorry to be such a newbie, but I simply must figure this out!

THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to physics forums.

Are you trying to show this from the mathematics of the Lorentz Transformation, or are you trying to understand it on some more fundamental physical basis?

If you are just trying to do it from the mathematics, then there are two ways to do it.

Method 1:

delta_s^2 = -(delta_t'^2) + delta_x'^2 = -(delta_t^2) + 0

Method 2:

If Δx=0, then
Δt&#039;=γΔt
 
thrush said:
Hi!

I am new here, thought to join as I am trying to learn Relativity, in this case Special Relativity. I have solved a bunch of problems already but ...

The Lorentz Transform formulation I am dealing with is a 4x4 matrix. I understand the invariance of the spacetime interval and have solved it several times:

delta_s^2 = -(delta_t^2) + delta_x^2 ... delta_y, delta_z are zero.
That's good but it has nothing to do with the following. I presume you already know that.

thrush said:
What I don't get is that for any event in frame S, where delta_X (and delta_Y, delta_Z) = 0, and only delta_T is non-zero, I am the guy standing on the train station watching the train pass.
OK, you've just described your worldline, the sequence of events marking off your Proper Time where you are standing stationary at the spatial origin of frame S. (Note that you haven't described any events for the passing train.)
thrush said:
Why then is the time in frame S', delta_t' never less than delta_t?
Presumably you intend for frame S' to be the rest frame of the train and the coordinates of the events that you have described are how your Proper Time is dilated in the train frame, that is, it takes more Coordinate Time to mark of an equivalent amount of your Proper Time.
thrush said:
It can't be because the denominator sqrt(1-B^2) can never be greater than 1!
Correct.
thrush said:
How can the passing train's time interval delta_t' be greater than the 'stationary' observer?
Because you are only stationary in frame S. In frame S' you are moving and your Proper Time is dilated. Remember, I said you didn't describe any events in frame S corresponding to the moving train. Or you could describe events for the stationary train in frame S' and transform them into frame S and then you would see that they would represent Time Dilation of the moving train.
thrush said:
I thought a velocity like β=3/5C would make delta_t' in the train's inertial reference frame always delta_t' < delta_t?
Yes, the events in your rest frame corresponding to your stationary position and marked off by delta_t are dilated when transformed into the train's rest frame and marked off by delta_t'. Let me add in a couple spacetime diagrams to depict what I have said. The first one is for frame S in which you are stationary at the spatial origin. I have only shown the plot going from 4 microseconds prior to the origin and 4 microseconds after:

attachment.php?attachmentid=59255&stc=1&d=1370327473.png

Each blue dot represents one microsecond of time in the rest frame S and has coordinates of an event.

Now we transform all the coordinates of the blue dot events into a frame moving at 3/5c towards the right:

attachment.php?attachmentid=59256&stc=1&d=1370327473.png

Now we see how you are depicted in the train frame: you are moving to the left and your time is dilated or stretched out compared to the Coordinate Time of the train frame.

thrush said:
Sorry to be such a newbie, but I simply must figure this out!
Hopefully you can now.
thrush said:
THANKS
You're welcome.
 

Attachments

  • ObserverWatchingTrainA.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainA.PNG
    1.1 KB · Views: 617
  • ObserverWatchingTrainB.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainB.PNG
    1.9 KB · Views: 648
Last edited:
Now I want to add into the train's rest frame S' events corresponding to it being at the spatial origin of its frame. I'll show the train in red (you are still blue):

attachment.php?attachmentid=59257&stc=1&d=1370328653.png

I think you can see that the train, at least the engineer's location, in his rest frame looks just like you did in your rest frame.

Now we transform all the events back into the original frame S:

attachment.php?attachmentid=59258&stc=1&d=1370328653.png

And now we see what I think you originally expected to see of the train's time being dilated.
 

Attachments

  • ObserverWatchingTrainC.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainC.PNG
    2.1 KB · Views: 623
  • ObserverWatchingTrainD.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainD.PNG
    2.1 KB · Views: 626
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top