Confusion in Doppler shift equation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the derivation of the Doppler shift equation for a moving observer and a stationary source, specifically focusing on a particular algebraic step in the process. Participants are seeking clarification on the mathematical reasoning behind the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is attempting to build the Doppler shift equation and is confused about the origin of the term (1 - v/u)-1.
  • Another participant references a previous equation involving Δt0 and Δts, suggesting that the confusion can be resolved through algebraic manipulation.
  • There is a request for clarification on whether Δt0 should be treated as 1 in the context of the algebra being discussed.
  • Participants express a desire to understand the algebraic steps involved rather than just the final result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification on specific algebraic steps without reaching a consensus on the interpretation of Δt0.

Contextual Notes

There are missing assumptions regarding the definitions of variables and the context of the equations being referenced, which may affect the understanding of the algebra involved.

Tim541541
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm just trying to build Doppler shift equation for Moving observer and stationary source. I have an problem in a step. I'm attaching a screen-shot please check it and tell me where to this step ( 1 - v/u)^-1 comes from ?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • 2016-01-02_202639.png
    2016-01-02_202639.png
    49.8 KB · Views: 622
Science news on Phys.org
The previous line is ##\Delta{t}_0=\Delta{t}_s+\frac{v\Delta{t}_0}{u}##. It's just algebra from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tim541541
Solve for Δt0 in the first equation at the attached image.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tim541541
Nugatory said:
The previous line is ##\Delta{t}_0=\Delta{t}_s+\frac{v\Delta{t}_0}{u}##. It's just algebra from there.
Thank you Nugatory for reply. Can you tell me is that delta t sub o will be mentioned as 1 here ? Actually i just really want to understand algebra behind it.
 
Tim541541 said:
Thank you Nugatory for reply. Can you tell me is that delta t sub o will be mentioned as 1 here ? Actually i just really want to understand algebra behind it.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "will be mentioned as 1 here"... The algebra is, as Erland says above, just solving for ##\Delta{t}_0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K