I Confusion on binding energy and ionization energy.

Cedric Chia
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
1) I know that the binding energy is the energy that holds a nucleus together ( which equals to the mass defect E = mc2 ). But what does it mean when we are talking about binding energy of an electron ( eg. binding energy = -Z2R/n2 ? ). Some website saying that " binding energy = - ionization energy " while the others saying that " binding energy = excitation energy - ionization energy ", which is true and what is the meaning of a binding energy of an electron?

2) What is the relationship between binding energy, ionization energy and excitation energy? ( eg. change in binding energy = change in excitation energy ? )

3) Is the ground state for a multielectron quantum system not necessarily n = 0 ? Let's say Rubidium atom ( atomic number 37 ), what is the quantum number n and L associate to it's ground state and first excitation energy state ? Since it's electron configuration is 1s22s22p63s23p64s23d104p65s1 , is the ground state 5s and the first excitation state 4d ( because the next orbital after 5s is 4d ) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cedric Chia said:
I know that the binding energy is the energy that holds a nucleus together

More precisely, the energy it would take to disassemble the nucleus, i..e, take it apart.

Cedric Chia said:
what does it mean when we are talking about binding energy of an electron

The energy it would take to remove the electron from the atom.

Cedric Chia said:
Some website saying that " binding energy = - ionization energy " while the others saying that " binding energy = excitation energy - ionization energy "

Can you give specific references?

Cedric Chia said:
What is the relationship between binding energy, ionization energy and excitation energy?

I'm not sure what you mean by "excitation energy".

In an atom with one electron (such as a neutral hydrogen atom), the ionization energy and the binding energy are the same thing. For a hydrogen atom in its ground state, that energy is 13.6 eV: it takes 13.6 eV to ionize the atom (remove the electron from it), so that is the binding energy.

In atoms with multiple electrons, it gets more complicated.

Cedric Chia said:
Let's say Rubidium atom ( atomic number 37 ), what is the quantum number n and L associate to it's ground state and first excitation energy state ?

There isn't a single n because the atom has more than one electron.

Cedric Chia said:
Since it's electron configuration is 1s22s22p63s23p64s23d104p65s1 , is the ground state 5s and the first excitation state 4d ( because the next orbital after 5s is 4d ) ?

No. The entire electron configuration is the ground state.
 
PeterDonis said:
In atoms with multiple electrons, it gets more complicated.
For a single electron system, it's binding energy would just be -RZ2/n2 (where R = 13.606(eV) ). But when we're talking about multielectron system, it's binding energy would become -RZeff2/n2 (since there will be shielding effect due to the inner elecrons, where we need to figure out the Zeff before finding the value of binding energy of each electrons? )

PeterDonis said:
I'm not sure what you mean by "excitation energy".
Excitation energy is the discrete amount of energy required to promote an electron from ground state to higher energy state ( eg. an excitation energy of 10.2 electron volts is required to promote the electron from its ground state to the first excited state. A different excitation energy (12.1 electron volts) is needed to raise the electron from its ground state to the second excited state ).
Having said that, what is the relationship between excitation energy, binding energy and ionization energy? (eg. binding energy = - ionization energy?, change in binding energy = excitation energy? ).

PeterDonis said:
No. The entire electron configuration is the ground state.
Does it mean that for the outer electron, it's ground state is 5s and for the atom itself the entire electron configuration is it's ground state, since that is the most probable way to have lowest energy state, and the first excited state happen when the outer electron promoted to the next energy level?
 
Cedric Chia said:
when we're talking about multielectron system, it's binding energy would become -RZeff2/n2

It's more than that: for a multi-electron system, there are multiple possible "binding energies", so you have to be more specific: are you referring to the energy required to remove the outermost electron from the atom? Or to remove two or three? Many metallic elements have ions with more than one positive charge (meaning with more than one electron removed). Or are you referring to the additional energy required to remove, say, a second electron after one has been removed? All of these energies are different.

Cedric Chia said:
Excitation energy is the discrete amount of energy required to promote an electron from ground state to higher energy state

Ok.

Cedric Chia said:
Having said that, what is the relationship between excitation energy, binding energy and ionization energy?

There isn't one. Excitation energy is just a different thing: promoting an electron from ground state to a higher energy state is just a different thing from removing it from the atom altogether. There is no necessary relationship between the energies involved.

Cedric Chia said:
Does it mean that for the outer electron, it's ground state is 5s

No. The atom as a whole has a ground state, not individual electrons. You can say that when the atom is in its ground state, the electron configuration is what you gave.

Cedric Chia said:
for the atom itself the entire electron configuration is it's ground state, since that is the most probable way to have lowest energy state

It's not the "most probable way" to have the lowest energy state; it is the lowest energy state (the only one).

Cedric Chia said:
the first excited state happen when the outer electron promoted to the next energy level?

That's one way of having an excited state, but not the only one. You could also promote some other electron besides the outermost one.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top