Confusion on relative velocity sign

  • Thread starter Thread starter niko_niko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the relative velocity of Chris swimming upstream in a current. The textbook states that Chris's upstream velocity relative to Earth is c-v, which some participants question, suggesting it should be v-c instead. The key point is that if downstream is considered positive, then upstream must be negative, leading to the conclusion that the correct expression for upstream speed is indeed c-v. Participants note that the choice of coordinate system affects the interpretation of velocity signs. Overall, clarity in variable naming and direction conventions is emphasized to avoid such confusion.
niko_niko
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Problem: Two swimmers, Chris and Sarah, start together at the same point on the bank of a wide stream that flows with a speed v. Both move at the same speed c (where c > v) relative to the water. Chris swims downstream a distance L and then upstream the same distance.
Relevant Equations
v_PA = v_PB + u_BA
The downstream part is no problem: c_E = c + v.
My only question is why is the upstream velocity of Chris relative to the Earth c-v, as said by the textbook, and not v-c? Assuming v is to the right and positive, doesn't c become negative since it is in the opposite direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
niko_niko said:
Homework Statement: Problem: Two swimmers, Chris and Sarah, start together at the same point on the bank of a wide stream that flows with a speed v. Both move at the same speed c (where c > v) relative to the water. Chris swims downstream a distance L and then upstream the same distance.
Relevant Equations: v_PA = v_PB + u_BA

The downstream part is no problem: c_E = c + v.
My only question is why is the upstream velocity of Chris relative to the Earth c-v, as said by the textbook, and not v-c? Assuming v is to the right and positive, doesn't c become negative since it is in the opposite direction?
In terms of velocity, if downstream is positive, then upstream is negative. If you change the sign of ##c##, then you are changing the positive direction.
 
The upstream speed is, of course, ##v -c##, as speed is non-negative.
 
PeroK said:
The upstream speed is, of course, ##v -c##, as speed is non-negative.
For some reason, the current speed is ##v## while the swimmer speed is ##c##. With ##c > v##, I make the upstream speed ##c-v##.

Authors would be well advised to pick mnemonic variable names.

If the textbook uses the phrase "upstream velocity", this could be interpreted to indicate the use of an upstream-positive coordinate system. So the positive value ##c-v## would be appropriate.
 
  • Like
Likes Gavran and PeroK
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top