Confusion regarding sin and cos

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the use of sine and cosine in physics, particularly in calculating torque. Torque is calculated using the formula τ = r X F, where the sine of the angle between the force and the position vector is essential. The sine function is associated with the opposite side of a right triangle, which is relevant when determining the perpendicular distance in torque calculations. The relationship between tension and angle is clarified, emphasizing that as the angle approaches zero, the sine function also approaches zero, indicating a loss of tension. Understanding these trigonometric principles is crucial for accurately solving physics problems involving forces and angles.
ness9660
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Generally I am confused about the use of sin and cos in physics problems.

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/3162/eg2gu.gif


The torque about the beam's attachment to the wall is:

T * 8 * sin(53)


Where T is the tension of the wire.

Why is sin the choice and not cos?

The best correlation I've come up with so far was in two dimensional collisions, where motion in the y-axis is always associated with sin, while the x-axis with cos.


Can anyone give any insight?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ness9660 said:
Generally I am confused about the use of sin and cos in physics problems.

[snip]
The best correlation I've come up with so far was in two dimensional collisions, where motion in the y-axis is always associated with sin, while the x-axis with cos.

Can anyone give any insight?

better:
cos goes with ADJACENT side
sin goes with OPPOSITE side
(from the definitions of sin() and cos(), of course).
 
No, don't use "blind" methods of association to learn stuff like that - you will make mistakes later on (and they are not always applicable). (edit : this is in reference to the orig. post, not robphy's reply)

The magnitude of the moment (torque) of a force about a point is the product of the force and the perpendicular distance from the point to the line of force (this is called the "moment arm"). Draw a perpendicular from the point of attachment at the wall to the wire (which corresponds to the direction of the tensional force) and calculate the length of the perpendicular segment with trig.

More properly, the definition of torque is \tau = r X F, meaning the cross product of the position vector of the point of application of force (taking the fulcrum to be the origin) and the force itself.

By the definition of the cross product, the magnitude of the torque will always come out to the product of the magnitudes of the distance and the force times the sine of the angle between them, i.e.

|\tau| = |r||F|\sin \theta

which you can verify is the case in this problem too (though in this case, \theta is actually (180 - 53) = 127 degrees, which has the same sine as 53 degrees). The only thing is that torque (properly defined) is a vector quantity, and its direction is at right angles to the other two vectors, in this case, the torque vector will be pointing out of the page at you.
 
Last edited:
Good info already stated. What i'll say is that perhaps it's better to view the result as 8*(T*sin(53)). Now look at the term in parenthesis...

T*sin(53). what would happen to the tension in the rope if the 53 degrees went to 0? Since the rope and the beam would then be the same length the tension would be 0 also. So ask the question "if theta went to 0, what trig function sin or cos would also give me 0?" You have to have the problem set up right with axes and all that, but this helps when trying to decide between sin and cos...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top