Confusion with work and constant velocity

AI Thread Summary
Constant velocity implies no acceleration, resulting in no net force and no work done on an object, as illustrated by the sailboat example. However, when an elevator is pulled upward at constant velocity, while there is no work done on kinetic energy due to unchanged speed, potential energy (PE) does increase. The work done against gravitational force in raising the elevator results in a change in potential energy, which is equal to the work done. Thus, while constant velocity indicates no work on kinetic energy, it does not negate the work associated with changes in potential energy. Understanding the distinction between work done on kinetic energy and potential energy is crucial in these scenarios.
okgo
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I'm confused about work and constant velocity. In a sailboat example, if the boat is going at constant velocity then there is no acceleration, therefore no net Force and no work.

However, let's say there is an elevator being pulled upward by a pulley at constant velocity. This would mean the elevator is not accelerating so no net Force, and then no work.
But I'm confused about PE. Since the elevator is being pulled upward, wouldn't PE increase and isn't change in PE = W? So work would increase with increase in PE?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
okgo said:

Homework Statement


So I'm confused about work and constant velocity. In a sailboat example, if the boat is going at constant velocity then there is no acceleration, therefore no net Force and no work.

However, let's say there is an elevator being pulled upward by a pulley at constant velocity. This would mean the elevator is not accelerating so no net Force, and then no work.
But I'm confused about PE. Since the elevator is being pulled upward, wouldn't PE increase and isn't change in PE = W? So work would increase with increase in PE?

Not exactly. For the ship there is work against friction in pushing the boat through the water, likely even can be somewhat determined from the weight of the water that is churned by the propeller. There is no acceleration, so no work goes into kinetic energy of the mass of the ship.

For your elevator there is no work again going into kinetic energy, because there is no change in speed. But there is a change in potential energy. For instance if you cut the rope and the elevator fell back to the starting point there would be that much kinetic energy carried by the elevator as it passed that point going down.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top