Conical Solar Tunnel to Redirect Solar Radiation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a solar tunnel to redirect both visible light and heat with minimal losses, aiming for a 30-degree deflection of incident radiation. An inverted truncated cone with a polished inner surface is proposed, raising questions about the ideal shape for the inner surface—whether conical, cylindrical, planar, or curved (parabolic or elliptical) would be most effective. The goal is to transport light and heat 50 meters deep, with concerns about the feasibility of using lenses for this distance, as traditional methods may not maintain sufficient light. A suggestion is made to consider quartz optical fibers fed by a tracking solar concentrator for better efficiency. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maximizing incident radiation retention through the choice of design and materials.
jude.dsouza
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Am looking to build a solar tunnel that would not only redirect solar visible light radiation, but also heat, with minimum losses. Basically need to deflect angle of incident radiation by around 30 degrees.

Am considering an inverted truncated cone design, with a polished inner surface, which would be slightly tilted with respect to incident radiation. My question is - what section would be ideal for the inner surface

- would a conical surface work best as planned, or is a cylinder better?

- would a planar surface work, or would it be more efficient with a curved inner surface, parabolic or elliptical ?

Am looking to carry the heat / light deep down into a 50 metre deep distance. Would any lens be able to do that? Do not need to concentrate, just redirect the radiation. Am not sure if there are any lenses that can carry light that far ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You will be hard pressed to do 50 meters. Your best shot would be quartz optical fibers fed by a tracking solar concentrator. Anything else will gobble up the light unless your diameter for the shaft is 5 meters or more.
 
Thanks Antiphon

As a matter of fact, I am looking to build in the 3.5 - 4 metre diameter range.

How would an ideal section work in that case? Again, would it be possible to use an array of lenses to substitute the truncated cone? Refraction over Reflection ?

Which would be more efficient, as am concerned about maintaining as much of the incident radiation as possible ?

Thanks for your quick reply, and shall look that option up as well.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top