Connection and tensor-issue with the proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsaad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection Proof
rsaad
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am tying to prove the following:
\Gamma^{a}_{bc} T^{bc} =0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I approached this problem as follows:
dx_{b}/dx^{c} * e^{a} (e^{b} . e^{c}) but it did not yield anything.
Then I expanded the christoeffel symbols into g s and again I am not sure what to do next.So any hints please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your post is incomplete to say the least. What is ##\tau^{bc}## to start with?
 
That's a tensor.
 
a symmetric tensor.
 
In a coordinate basis? A non-holonomic basis?
 
Again you are not being specific enough. ##\Gamma^{a}_{bc}\tau^{bc} = 0## is certainly not true in general for any symmetric tensor ##\tau^{bc}## if ##\Gamma^{a}_{bc}## are the coefficients of the Levi-Civita connection. It is only true in general if ##\tau^{bc}## is antisymmetric so you must specify what exactly the tensor ##\tau^{bc}## is.
 
Γabc are the christoffel symbols/connection and T^(bc) = (e^b,e^c)
 
rsaad said:
Γabc are the christoffel symbols/connection and T^(bc) = (e^b,e^c)

Do you mean T^{bc} = T \left( e^b , e^c \right)?
 
yes.
 
  • #10
And \left\{ e_a \right\} is an orthonormal basis?
 
  • #11
Yes, it is,
 
  • #12
First, In don't think that you should write \Gamma^a{}_{bc} instead of \Gamma^a_{bc}.

Second, what anti-symmetry property does the Levi-Civita connection have with respect to an orthonormal basis?
 
Back
Top