Why do conservation laws in mechanics lead to symmetry principles?

AI Thread Summary
Conservation laws in mechanics, such as linear momentum, angular momentum, and energy, are linked to symmetries like homogeneity and isotropy of space and time. The discussion highlights that the relationship between symmetry and conservation laws is encapsulated in Noether's theorem, which is more general than Newtonian mechanics. While the virtual work method can connect to Lagrangian mechanics, explaining these concepts purely in Newtonian terms is less common. An example provided illustrates that a freely spinning object maintains its angular momentum due to the symmetry around its rotation axis. Understanding these principles can enhance comprehension of the foundational aspects of mechanics.
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
I do not know the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian principles of mechanics. However,I came to know that conservation of linear momentum,angular momentum and conservaton of energy lead to homogeneity of space,isotropy of space and homogeneity of time.Can anyone show why it is in purely Newtonian terms?I am familiar with virtual work methods...Otherwise if these conservation laws can be proved from the symmetry principles?You may also refer me to some link.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the other way around ...
A symmetry leads to a conservation law, this is called the Noether theorem.
It is more general than Newtoniam mechanics.
The virtual work method is the origin of Lagragian mechanics.
So indeed, it should be possible to explain it on this basis, but this is not usual.
Google for Noether, maybe you will find the connections you need.

Intuitively, this theorem is very clear.
Think to a freely spinning object for example: no force break the symmetry around the rotation axis.
If some force would define a preffered position for the spinning object, the angular momentum would not be conserved any more.
 
Thank you for your help.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top