Conservation Laws and Projectile Motion

physicspupil
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cannon in a fort overlooking the ocean fires a shell of mass M at an elevation angle, theta and muzzle velocity, v0. At the highest point, the shell explodes into two fragments (masses m1 + m2 = M), with an additional energy E, traveling in the original horizontal direction. Find the distance separating the two fragments when they land in the ocean. For simplicity, assume the cannon is at sea level.

Homework Equations



Conservation of Momentum:

px: Mv0cos(theta) = m1v1cos(theta) + m2v2cos(theta)

py: Mv0sin(theta) = m1v1sin(theta) + m2v2sin(theta)

Conservation of Energy

Mv0^2/2 + E = m1v1^2/2 + m2v2^2/2

Maybe

y = y0 + v0tsin(theta) – gt^2/2 and x = x0 + v0tcos(theta) at the end…


The Attempt at a Solution



First I used the kinematic equations to find the time when the two broken things will hit the ocean (they hit at the same time, I think)… t = 2v0sin(theta)/g

Then I tried to find v2 in terms of v1. I did this by squaring px and py above…

(M^2)(v0^2)(sin^2 + cos^2) = (m1^2)(v1^2) (sin^2 + cos^2) + etc.

I got v0^2 = (m1v1 + m2v2)^2/M^2 and plugged this into the conservation of energy equation…

If I can ever get my algebra correct, I was thinking about plugging this result back into the above equations and messing with things until I can get both v1 and v2 in terms of v0…

Then I can just use the x component of the kinematic equations to find their distance from the cannon, right? And take the difference?.. It seems simple enough, but its just not working out for me. Is there a better/easier way to do this? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track. The energy equation you have, however, is not in the most convenient form. Can you express vo in terms of the original energy (rhetorical question)?

Yeah, you have the equations down though, and the rest of the problem is just algebraic manipulation, and a lot of it at that.
 
Thanks, Mindscrape I figured out how to write my v1 and v2 in terms of v0, so I think I can do it now.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top