Conservation Laws - Linear & Angular Momentum Explained

AI Thread Summary
In classical physics, conservation laws are linked to symmetries, with translation symmetry resulting in the conservation of linear momentum and rotational symmetry leading to the conservation of angular momentum. Noether's Theorem provides a mathematical framework that explains this relationship between symmetries and conservation laws. For a deeper understanding, resources that elaborate on Noether's Theorem can be beneficial. A simple Google search using the term "Noether's Theorem" will yield valuable information. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping fundamental principles in physics.
shaner-baner
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I have read that in classical physics, symmetry under tranlsation implies conservation of linear momentum, and that symmetry under rotation implies conservation of angular momentum. Could you guys give me a brief explanation, or if the explanation is not brief Point me towards a good website. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magic phrase for a Google search on this subject is "Noether's Theorem". :smile:
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Conservation of Momentum versus Conservation of Velocity
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Conservation of angular momentum during collisions
Replies
3
Views
3K
Conservation of linear and angular momentum
Replies
9
Views
2K
Symmetries and Conservation Laws
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Angular Momentum problem v2 (mass moving inward or outward)
Replies
5
Views
2K
Conservation of angular momentum and its counterpart for linear momentum
Replies
13
Views
3K
Conservation of Angular Momentum is Dumbfounding
Replies
36
Views
16K
2-body problem - conservation of angular momentum
Replies
40
Views
4K
Conceptual questions about Angular Momentum Conservation and torque
Replies
2
Views
2K
Conserved quantity due to invariance under temporal rotations
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top