Conservation of angular momentum and energy

AI Thread Summary
When a spinning body changes shape, its moment of inertia alters, affecting its angular velocity while conserving angular momentum due to the absence of net torque. The rotational kinetic energy may change, leading to a conversion of excess kinetic energy into translational motion. The work required to pull weights closer in a spinning system illustrates this energy transformation, as does the work generated when weights are allowed to move outward. The direction of angular velocity can change, influenced by the shape change's effect on the inertial tensor. Overall, both energy and angular momentum are conserved in such scenarios.
StatusX
Homework Helper
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2
if you have a spinning body, and then its shape changes so that the moment of inertia changes, what happens? If angular velocity is conserved, since there's no net torque, then it spins a different speed, but the same direction. But then has the rotational kinetic energy changed? And if so, does this mean the excess kinetic energy must take the form of translational motion? Does it matter if the change in shape was symmetrical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a very simple example - two weights connected by a cord spinning around their common center.

If you pull the weights in, it will require work to do so. (The easiest way to see this is to go to a non-inertial frame that's corotating with the weights, and consider the centrifugal force). Similarly, if you let the weights go out, work will be generated and must be dissipated (perhaps by friction).

Energy and angular momentum will both be conserved.
 
The (instantaneous) angular velocity may well change its direction, since (for one) we cannot assume that the shapechange does not affect the inertial tensor (with respect to the C.M).
The angular momentum, remains, however, constant.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top