Conservation of Angular Momentum: angular speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the conservation of angular momentum, where a student on a rotating stool adjusts the position of dumbbells. The initial moment of inertia is calculated by considering the dumbbells as point masses, which simplifies the calculation. The student seeks clarity on whether to model the dumbbells as rods or point masses for determining moment of inertia. It is concluded that treating the dumbbells as point masses is sufficient for this scenario. The focus remains on applying the conservation of angular momentum to find the new angular speed after the dumbbells are pulled in.
mickellowery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A student sits on a freely rotating stool holding 2 3.00kg dumbbells. When the students arms are extended horizontally the dumbbells are 1.00m from the axis of rotation and the student rotates with an angular speed of 0.750 rad/sec. The moment of inertia of the student and the stool is 3.00 kgm2 and it is assumed to be constant. The student pulls the dumbbells in to a position 0.300m from the rotation axis. What is the new angular speed?


Homework Equations


I was going to try Ii\omegai=If\omegaf but the problem with this is that the problem says I is constant at 3.00 kgm2. I assume that I need to factor in the radius somehow but I'm not sure how to do it.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the dumbells are at 1m, what is the moment of inertia of them?

Add that to the inertia of the stool and you have the initial moment of inertia.

initial angular momentum = Iinitialωinitial.


When the dumbells are at 0.3m, what is the moment of inertia then? (Add this to get inertia of the stool to get the final moment of inertia)
 
So can I model the dumbbells as a rod and use 1/12 ML2 as the moment of inertia or do I have to integrate \int\rhodV? I am facing problems with both ways, I don't know what the volume would be if I integrate, and it seems like modeling as a rod would not be correct.
 
mickellowery said:
So can I model the dumbbells as a rod and use 1/12 ML2 as the moment of inertia or do I have to integrate \int\rhodV? I am facing problems with both ways, I don't know what the volume would be if I integrate, and it seems like modeling as a rod would not be correct.

No need to do all of that. Just treat them as point masses such that I=mr2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top