B Conservation of Angular Momentum - Problem understanding this scenario

AI Thread Summary
In a closed system, both linear and angular momentum are conserved, but their conservation can appear counterintuitive in certain scenarios. When two equal mass balls are fired from a stationary disk in opposite directions, the linear momentum remains zero, while the disk begins to spin, indicating a change in angular momentum. The key point is that the angular momentum of the balls must be considered, as they possess angular momentum relative to the center of the disk. This illustrates how linear motion can still contribute to angular momentum when measured from a specific point. Understanding these relationships clarifies the conservation principles in such dynamic systems.
jonhswon
Messages
10
Reaction score
4
Hello,

As far I know, in a closed system both, linear and angular monentums, are conserved.

İmagine such a scenario: everything is motionless, both momentums zero initially, then from a disk are fired (compressed spring push) two equal mass balls at same speed but opposite direction. Now balls fly away and disk is spinning. Linear momentum after firing is still zero, but angular momentum is not? What is happening?

(All usual assumptions in place, inertial reference, massless springs, etc..)

Thnaks in advance.

1702886385490.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jonhswon said:
angular momentum is not
Have you taken into account the angular momentum of the balls?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
... an object moving in a straight line at constant velocity has angular momentum about any point not on the line of motion.

Note also that angular momentum is always measured relative to some point.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ibix
OMG I was so blind. Thanks a lot !
 
I first had this discussion the other way round when a classmate at university lobbed a shoe at the door to shut it. It's quite neat how the changing tangential component of linear velocity cancels with the changing radial distance to produce a constant angular momentum for an object in linear motion.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top